From: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NULL pointer dereference in swsusp_free with 3.17-rc5
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:20:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87egv0i2sl.fsf@nemi.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19091504.rBv2mCrhao@vostro.rjw.lan> (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Thu, 25 Sep 2014 01:44:12 +0200")
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:
> I've decided to go with a revert for 3.17, as we don't seem to have an immediate
> fix and the final 3.17 may be as close as this Sunday. So I'm going to send my
> final pull request for 3.17 to Linus tomorrow or early on Friday.
Sounds safest to me, FWIW.
For the next round of this, I think the only missing part was some test
like
if (!forbidden_pages_map || !free_pages_map)
goto return_without_freeing_anything;
at the beginning of swsusp_free(). I think we can agree that it isn't
necessary to repeat that test for every page like the old code did :-)
But I I believe it would be useful to analyze exactly why this is
necessary, and possibly add a comment with that explanation. I don't
have any other arguments for the test than the old code and the oops.
If this is how it is designed then that would be nice to spell out. If
not, then maybe there is a flaw somewhere else that should be fixed
instead.
And BTW, I believe it would be useful if at least one more person in the
world tested hibernation between each release ;-)
Bjørn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-25 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-23 14:50 NULL pointer dereference in swsusp_free with 3.17-rc5 Bjørn Mork
2014-09-23 15:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-23 17:27 ` Bjørn Mork
2014-09-23 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-24 9:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-09-23 21:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-24 7:45 ` Bjørn Mork
2014-09-24 9:51 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-09-24 10:17 ` Bjørn Mork
2014-09-24 23:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-25 7:20 ` Bjørn Mork [this message]
2014-09-25 9:13 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-09-25 10:54 ` Bjørn Mork
2014-09-25 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87egv0i2sl.fsf@nemi.mork.no \
--to=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).