From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Jarzmik Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] thermal/drivers/core: Remove the module Kconfig's option Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 22:40:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87h8bdpkqe.fsf@belgarion.home> References: <20190402161256.11044-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190402161256.11044-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> (Daniel Lezcano's message of "Tue, 2 Apr 2019 18:12:44 +0200") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: rui.zhang@intel.com, edubezval@gmail.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Russell King , Ralf Baechle , Paul Burton , James Hogan , Guan Xuetao , Andrew Morton , Alexey Brodkin , Arnd Bergmann , Enric Balletbo i Serra , Daniel Mack , "moderated list:ARM PORT" , "open list:MIPS" List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Daniel Lezcano writes: > The module support for the thermal subsystem makes little sense: > - some subsystems relying on it are not modules, thus forcing the > framework to be compiled in > - it is compiled in for almost every configs, the remaining ones > are a few platforms where I don't see why we can not switch the thermal > to 'y'. The drivers can stay in tristate. > - platforms need the thermal to be ready as soon as possible at boot time > in order to mitigate > > Usually the subsystems framework are compiled-in and the plugs are as module. > > Remove the module option. The removal of the module related dead code will > come after this patch gets in or is acked. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck > For mini2440: > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski For pxa: Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik Cheers. -- Robert