linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: "Okanovic, Haris" <harisokn@amazon.com>
Cc: "ankur.a.arora@oracle.com" <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
	"joao.m.martins@oracle.com" <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dianders@chromium.org" <dianders@chromium.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"pmladek@suse.com" <pmladek@suse.com>,
	"wanpengli@tencent.com" <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"daniel.lezcano@linaro.org" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	"mihai.carabas@oracle.com" <mihai.carabas@oracle.com>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"mic@digikod.net" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"vkuznets@redhat.com" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"npiggin@gmail.com" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"juerg.haefliger@canonical.com" <juerg.haefliger@canonical.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] cpuidle/poll_state: replace cpu_relax with smp_cond_load_relaxed
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 11:46:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87il0rsnf0.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aada0beae0b3479bfa311eea94a3b595bb8e5835.camel@amazon.com>


Okanovic, Haris <harisokn@amazon.com> writes:

> On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 16:14 -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>>
>>
>>
>> Okanovic, Haris <harisokn@amazon.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 09:41 +0200, Mihai Carabas wrote:
>> > > cpu_relax on ARM64 does a simple "yield". Thus we replace it with
>> > > smp_cond_load_relaxed which basically does a "wfe".
>> > >
>> > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas@oracle.com>
>> > > ---
>> > >  drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>> > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c b/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
>> > > index 9b6d90a72601..1e45be906e72 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
>> > > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>> > >  static int __cpuidle poll_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> > >                             struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
>> > >  {
>> > > +    unsigned long ret;
>> > >      u64 time_start;
>> > >
>> > >      time_start = local_clock_noinstr();
>> > > @@ -26,12 +27,16 @@ static int __cpuidle poll_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> > >
>> > >              limit = cpuidle_poll_time(drv, dev);
>> > >
>> > > -            while (!need_resched()) {
>> > > -                    cpu_relax();
>> > > -                    if (loop_count++ < POLL_IDLE_RELAX_COUNT)
>> > > -                            continue;
>> > > -
>> > > +            for (;;) {
>> > >                      loop_count = 0;
>> > > +
>> > > +                    ret = smp_cond_load_relaxed(&current_thread_info()->flags,
>> > > +                                                VAL & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED ||
>> > > +                                                loop_count++ >= POLL_IDLE_RELAX_COUNT);
>> >
>> > Is it necessary to repeat this 200 times with a wfe poll?
>>
>> The POLL_IDLE_RELAX_COUNT is there because on x86 each cpu_relax()
>> iteration is much shorter.
>>
>> With WFE, it makes less sense.
>>
>> > Does kvm not implement a timeout period?
>>
>> Not yet, but it does become more useful after a WFE haltpoll is
>> available on ARM64.
>
> Note that kvm conditionally traps WFE and WFI based on number of host
> CPU tasks. VMs will sometimes see hardware behavior - potentially
> polling for a long time before entering WFI.
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c#L459

Yeah. There was a discussion on this
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/871qc6qufy.fsf@oracle.com/.

>> Haltpoll does have a timeout, which you should be able to tune via
>> /sys/module/haltpoll/parameters/ but that, of course, won't help here.
>>
>> > Could you make it configurable? This patch improves certain workloads
>> > on AWS Graviton instances as well, but blocks up to 6ms in 200 * 30us
>> > increments before going to wfi, which is a bit excessive.
>>
>> Yeah, this looks like a problem. We could solve it by making it an
>> architectural parameter. Though I worry about ARM platforms with
>> much smaller default timeouts.
>> The other possibility is using WFET in the primitive, but then we
>> have that dependency and that's a bigger change.
>
> See arm64's delay() for inspiration:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.9-rc2/source/arch/arm64/lib/delay.c#L26

Sure, that part is straight-forward enough. However, this will need a fallback
the case when WFET is not available. And, because this path is used on x86,
so we need a cross platform smp_cond*timeout(). Though given that the x86
version is based on cpu_relax() then that could just fold the sched_clock()
check in.

Maybe another place to do this would be by KVM forcing a WFE timeout. Arguably
that is needed regardless of whether we use a smp_cond*timeout() or not.

--
ankur

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-08 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-15  7:41 [PATCH v4] Enable haltpoll for arm64 Mihai Carabas
2024-02-15  7:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] x86: Move ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX to arch Mihai Carabas
2024-02-15  7:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] x86/kvm: Move haltpoll_want() to be arch defined Mihai Carabas
2024-02-15  7:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] governors/haltpoll: Drop kvm_para_available() check Mihai Carabas
2024-02-15  7:41 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] arm64: Select ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX Mihai Carabas
2024-02-15  7:41 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] arm64: Define TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG Mihai Carabas
2024-02-15  7:41 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] cpuidle-haltpoll: ARM64 support Mihai Carabas
2024-02-26  8:30   ` Tomohiro Misono (Fujitsu)
2024-02-15  7:41 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] cpuidle/poll_state: replace cpu_relax with smp_cond_load_relaxed Mihai Carabas
2024-02-26  8:36   ` Tomohiro Misono (Fujitsu)
2024-02-28  4:36     ` Ankur Arora
2024-04-05 21:51   ` Okanovic, Haris
2024-04-05 23:14     ` Ankur Arora
2024-04-06 18:42       ` Okanovic, Haris
2024-04-08 18:46         ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2024-04-08 20:04           ` Okanovic, Haris
2024-02-15  7:41 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] cpuidle: replace with HAS_CPU_RELAX with HAS_WANTS_IDLE_POLL Mihai Carabas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87il0rsnf0.fsf@oracle.com \
    --to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=juerg.haefliger@canonical.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=mihai.carabas@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).