From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: runtime PM: common hooks for static and runtime PM Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:26:37 -0800 Message-ID: <87iq9ljpzm.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Alan Stern's message of "Wed\, 24 Feb 2010 13\:56\:33 -0500 \(EST\)") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Alan Stern Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Alan Stern writes: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mark Brown wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:54:07AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: >> > On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Alan Stern wrote: >> >> > > I'll give it a try and we'll see how it turns out... >> >> > And here it is. You can see that the patch isn't ideal. >> >> > Anyway, it should do what you want -- I haven't tested it. >> >> It's taken a little while to test (and to be frank my testing is paper >> thin) but it looks like this does what I'm looking for - thanks! > > But should that patch be submitted for inclusion in the kernel, > warts and all? I vote yes. Kevin