From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
"'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: 'the arch/x86 maintainers' <x86@kernel.org>,
"'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rafael@kernel.org>,
'Linux PM' <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
'Eric Dumazet' <edumazet@google.com>,
"'Paul E. McKenney'" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
'LKML' <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Subject: RE: [patch 00/10] x86/cpu: Consolidate APERF/MPERF code
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:45:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pml5180p.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005501d85503$3b00ca40$b1025ec0$@telus.net>
On Wed, Apr 20 2022 at 15:08, Doug Smythies wrote:
> On 2022.04.19 14:11 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> That's because after the changes in this series scaling_cur_freq
>>> returns 0 if the given CPU is idle.
>>
>> Which is sensible IMO as there is really no point in waking an idle CPU
>> just to read those MSRs, then wait 20ms wake it up again to read those
>> MSRs again.
>
> I totally agree.
> It is the inconsistency for what is displayed as a function of driver/governor
> that is my concern.
Raphael suggested to move the show_cpuinfo() logic into the a/mperf
code. See below.
Thanks,
tglx
---
Subject: x86/aperfmperf: Integrate the fallback code from show_cpuinfo()
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 15:19:29 +0200
Due to the avoidance of IPIs to idle CPUs arch_freq_get_on_cpu() can return
0 when the last sample was too long ago.
show_cpuinfo() has a fallback to cpufreq_quick_get() and if that fails to
return cpu_khz, but the readout code for the per CPU scaling frequency in
sysfs does not.
Move that fallback into arch_freq_get_on_cpu() so the behaviour is the same
when reading /proc/cpuinfo and /sys/..../cur_scaling_freq.
Suggested-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c | 10 +++++++---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | 7 +------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
@@ -405,12 +405,12 @@ void arch_scale_freq_tick(void)
unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
{
struct aperfmperf *s = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_samples, cpu);
+ unsigned int seq, freq;
unsigned long last;
- unsigned int seq;
u64 acnt, mcnt;
if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF))
- return 0;
+ goto fallback;
do {
seq = raw_read_seqcount_begin(&s->seq);
@@ -424,9 +424,13 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cp
* which covers idle and NOHZ full CPUs.
*/
if (!mcnt || (jiffies - last) > MAX_SAMPLE_AGE)
- return 0;
+ goto fallback;
return div64_u64((cpu_khz * acnt), mcnt);
+
+fallback:
+ freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
+ return freq ? freq : cpu_khz;
}
static int __init bp_init_aperfmperf(void)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -86,12 +86,7 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
unsigned int freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(cpu);
- if (!freq)
- freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
- if (!freq)
- freq = cpu_khz;
- seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n",
- freq / 1000, (freq % 1000));
+ seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n", freq / 1000, (freq % 1000));
}
/* Cache size */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-25 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-15 19:19 [patch 00/10] x86/cpu: Consolidate APERF/MPERF code Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-15 19:19 ` [patch 01/10] x86/aperfmperf: Dont wake idle CPUs in arch_freq_get_on_cpu() Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-19 15:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-15 19:19 ` [patch 02/10] x86/smp: Move APERF/MPERF code where it belongs Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-19 15:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-15 19:19 ` [patch 03/10] x86/aperfmperf: Separate AP/BP frequency invariance init Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-19 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-15 19:19 ` [patch 04/10] x86/aperfmperf: Untangle Intel and AMD " Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-19 16:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-15 19:19 ` [patch 05/10] x86/aperfmperf: Put frequency invariance aperf/mperf data into a struct Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-19 16:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-15 19:19 ` [patch 06/10] x86/aperfmperf: Restructure arch_scale_freq_tick() Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-19 16:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-15 19:19 ` [patch 07/10] x86/aperfmperf: Make parts of the frequency invariance code unconditional Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-19 16:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-15 19:20 ` [patch 08/10] x86/aperfmperf: Store aperf/mperf data for cpu frequency reads Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-19 16:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-15 19:20 ` [patch 09/10] x86/aperfmperf: Replace aperfmperf_get_khz() Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-19 16:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-15 19:20 ` [patch 10/10] x86/aperfmperf: Replace arch_freq_get_on_cpu() Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-19 16:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-19 15:51 ` [patch 00/10] x86/cpu: Consolidate APERF/MPERF code Eric Dumazet
2022-04-19 20:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-19 21:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-04-19 16:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-19 17:32 ` Doug Smythies
2022-04-19 18:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-19 21:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-20 22:08 ` Doug Smythies
2022-04-25 15:45 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2022-04-25 23:20 ` Doug Smythies
2022-04-19 21:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pml5180p.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).