From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard Subject: Re: Hibernation considerations Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:35:43 -0400 Message-ID: <87ps2lojlc.fsf@jbms.ath.cx> References: <200707171802.30903.rjw@sisk.pl> <200707172150.44417.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070721102520.GE1902@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070721102520.GE1902@elf.ucw.cz> (Pavel Machek's message of "Sat\, 21 Jul 2007 12\:25\:20 +0200") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: david@lang.hm, LKML , Kyle Moffett , Al Boldi , "Eric W. Biederman" , "Huang, Ying" , Andrew Morton , pm list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek writes: [snip] > So it will be break at least battery status and "AC plugged in" > status, because those are handled by ACPI and we do not know how to > control them by hand. It seems that it should be possible to initialize ACPI as if the system just booted up normally. Then battery status and such should be correct, since they are correct after normal initialization. It should be possible to make hibernate look just like a reboot to all of the devices, including ACPI stuff. -- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard