From: Antti P Miettinen <amiettinen@nvidia.com>
To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: CPU frequency booster
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:36:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4yu22ja.fsf@amiettinen-lnx.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 201201192353.00761.trenn@suse.de
Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> writes:
> I can't see why pm_qos is needed at all, better use cpufreq
> providing interface.
One reason for using PM QoS is that it provides an interface for user
space. We want to be able to control frequency also from user space.
--Antti
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-20 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-19 12:53 [PATCH] input: CPU frequency booster Antti P Miettinen
2012-01-19 17:44 ` Pavel Machek
2012-01-22 10:55 ` Antti P Miettinen
2012-01-19 22:52 ` Thomas Renninger
2012-01-19 23:10 ` Thomas Renninger
2012-01-20 8:36 ` Antti P Miettinen [this message]
2012-01-20 10:50 ` Thomas Renninger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r4yu22ja.fsf@amiettinen-lnx.nvidia.com \
--to=amiettinen@nvidia.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox