From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Jarzmik Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/21] ARM: pxa: magician: Remove (temporarily) pasic3 LED support Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 18:25:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87vbc747er.fsf@belgarion.home> References: <55D25A74.3030902@tul.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from smtp02.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.124]:52985 "EHLO smtp.smtpout.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752795AbbHVQaA (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:30:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55D25A74.3030902@tul.cz> (Petr Cvek's message of "Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:04:36 +0200") Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Petr Cvek Cc: philipp.zabel@gmail.com, daniel@zonque.org, haojian.zhuang@gmail.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, cooloney@gmail.com, rpurdie@rpsys.net, j.anaszewski@samsung.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, sre@kernel.org, dbaryshkov@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Petr Cvek writes: > Temporarily remove pasic3 LEDs definition as it is not used (yet). I don't understand the split between this patch and patch 19/21. Is it for bisectability, are they symetric (this one removes what the next adds) ? As the patch 18/21 will probably go through Lee's tree, is there any value in keeping them apart ? Cheers. -- Robert