From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Anholt Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:39:26 -0800 Message-ID: <87zix9rjr5.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> References: <1450215622-27394-1-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net> <1450215622-27394-3-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net> <567093CD.1020208@gmail.com> <87oadrmfmi.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> <5670AAB2.1080102@gmail.com> <87mvtbkyd0.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> <20151216011110.GA13147@earth> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org ([131.252.210.177]:42546 "EHLO gabe.freedesktop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750990AbbLQAj3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:39:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Ulf Hansson , Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Sebastian Reichel , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Florian Fainelli , Alexander Aring , Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Lee Jones , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ian Campbell , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Ulf Hansson writes: > On 16 December 2015 at 02:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski > wrote: >> 2015-12-16 10:11 GMT+09:00 Sebastian Reichel : >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 04:53:31PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: >>>> >> There are 6 power domain drivers in >>>> >> arch/arm, 3 in drivers/clk, and 3 in drivers/soc. >>>> > >>>> > If we ever have to support a different architecture which happens to use >>>> > a similar power domain, then we want it to be in a location which makes >>>> > it easy for sharing it in the first place. As it stands today, it does >>>> > not seem useful to me to have this code in arch/arm/mach-bcm/ at all. >>>> > >>>> > Maybe there is room from a drivers/power/domains/ of some kind? >>> >>> I like the idea, but let's include generic power domain maintainers >>> in this discussion, as I suggested here (I got a power domain driver >>> patch for drivers/power just a few days ago): >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/815 >>> >>> Also somebody would have to step up to maintain that directory. >> >> This could go into drivers/soc. We put there a lot of mach-specific >> stuff which we want to make a little more generic (like generic enough >> multiplatform, multiarchitecture etc). Rockchip has its own power >> domains there. Dove and Mediatek seem as well but I am not sure. Some >> other architectures keep this still in arm/mach (exynos, ux500, zx, >> imx, s34c64xx, shmobile) but this looks more of like a legacy choice. > > Agree, drivers/soc is good. OK, I've resent with a move to drivers/soc/bcm/. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWcgQ+AAoJELXWKTbR/J7oubQQAKbCOi3iC5BGy1g3/rUlSiMm 5uTsfOe5ltjX2DDcXdRZTubpad5kDt95JY2e9lzdOH+ua1xkTwKOEOUYRCK4YjfJ dnvJcfOAoqtvMrbs8y78QJBv/o/eiuDZfbFFUBv2iKWJ+nsORSQI7728laoUObbs XWEptek7VZuG3hs2xTdcFd5/U7ho0hNOj17dUBQg2AABFcO9kflBryv/ngTwMqSl he3uLoiIobj/bTUcLNFnXYXwk+3AOnjP8amsGfRuoberuhLRFZNkYEd3TimvoSv6 fyx05Agvabusmpq8s++3bMTorVc5HpI5XmMKR1+NTcpcSv1wqvXebpSZl+ArTNsZ qjUC+GcEas0URTb9v+IwDTGhdJz3OJ5MtSJoZtsyN08QDLwhm9lzxc2sUDC4+5CT fe6YO6n2JSiqrs+sRRAUa0u3QiU3BliWR1Am7bgqjijP8K8cVMvX2PXwTTey0svL MRj4FwVuqJm6666FCedQiDtaLMnvVsENEygdhvacrj3bA208Sy7xUS6v0QsBMQiJ JDjy4h6lnGh0MeXdMU9pcoRVwOc183zff1b2Ef6rp7N4/FXzdqr+Yg0oUikZMtX4 VRYjZi7RDc2OiUDiXxFVdryf3ubHQBnwoeLnvF0UTB1QY0+hoDUbs7SWKFUs1j8Y K+wXndvXn2d3BaUD/zKf =Moa+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--