From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
"Kai-Heng Feng" <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2][v2] e1000e: Remove the runtime suspend restriction on CNP+
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:14:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d92dd25b45f711708701e11d6cf4e4d41b2bddc.1606370334.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1606370334.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Although there is platform issue of runtime suspend support
on CNP, it would be more flexible to let the user decide whether
to disable runtime or not because:
1. This can be done in userspace via
echo on > /sys/devices/pci0000\:00/0000\:00\:1f.d/power/control
2. More and more NICs would support runtime suspend, disabling the
runtime suspend on them by default would impact the validation.
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index e32d443feb24..2850535db7a1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -7684,7 +7684,7 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
dev_pm_set_driver_flags(&pdev->dev, DPM_FLAG_NO_DIRECT_COMPLETE |
DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND | DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME);
- if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev) && hw->mac.type < e1000_pch_cnp)
+ if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev))
pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
return 0;
--
2.17.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-26 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-26 6:14 [PATCH 0/2][v2] Leverage runtime suspend to speed up the s2ram on e1000e Chen Yu
2020-11-26 6:14 ` [PATCH 1/2][v2] e1000e: Assign DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND and DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME to speed up s2ram Chen Yu
2020-12-03 3:44 ` Chen Yu
2020-11-26 6:14 ` Chen Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d92dd25b45f711708701e11d6cf4e4d41b2bddc.1606370334.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sasha.neftin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).