From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH V2 Resend 17/44] cpufreq: kirkwood: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:56:19 +0530 Message-ID: <92dfaaae77a2f3cf8e5b21e67639746e98421827.1379309339.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> References: Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]:53641 "EHLO mail-pb0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753717Ab3IPN22 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:28:28 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id rr4so4082333pbb.34 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 06:28:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c index ba10658..59cbb35 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c @@ -125,19 +125,11 @@ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, /* Module init and exit code */ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - int result; - /* cpuinfo and default policy values */ policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 5000; /* 5uS */ policy->cur = kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency(0); - result = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, kirkwood_freq_table); - if (result) - return result; - - cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(kirkwood_freq_table, policy->cpu); - - return 0; + return cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, kirkwood_freq_table); } static int kirkwood_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e