From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH V2 Resend 06/44] cpufreq: arm_big_little: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:56:08 +0530 Message-ID: <93d548978b2ad6a92ad660ce23f8432f9c41de6f.1379309339.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> References: Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f50.google.com ([209.85.160.50]:39308 "EHLO mail-pb0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753120Ab3IPN10 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:27:26 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id uo5so4084166pbc.37 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 06:27:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c index 3549f07..5070273 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int bL_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (ret) return ret; - ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, freq_table[cur_cluster]); + ret = cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, freq_table[cur_cluster]); if (ret) { dev_err(cpu_dev, "CPU %d, cluster: %d invalid freq table\n", policy->cpu, cur_cluster); @@ -173,8 +173,6 @@ static int bL_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) return ret; } - cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(freq_table[cur_cluster], policy->cpu); - if (arm_bL_ops->get_transition_latency) policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = arm_bL_ops->get_transition_latency(cpu_dev); -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e