From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/27] cpufreq: scpi: Don't validate the frequency table twice Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:43:36 +0000 Message-ID: <96a6904f-2328-c316-4852-937772f95402@arm.com> References: <9a5c962bd3a225cfa87d6dcb0f6bb85697991c66.1519620578.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9a5c962bd3a225cfa87d6dcb0f6bb85697991c66.1519620578.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Viresh Kumar , Rafael Wysocki Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sudeep Holla List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 26/02/18 05:09, Viresh Kumar wrote: > The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after > calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers > don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the > policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. > > Stop validating the frequency table from scpi driver. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar FWIW, Acked-by: Sudeep Holla Tested-by: Sudeep Holla -- Regards, Sudeep