[PATCH 05/11] cpufreq: elanfreq: Use 'index' only to index into policy->freq_table

[Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>]

Later patches would make changes in cpufreq core, after which
policy->freq_table may be reordered by cpufreq core and it wouldn't be
safe anymore to use 'index' for any other local arrays.

To prepare for that, use policy->freq_table[index].driver_data for other
driver specific usage of 'index'. The 'driver_data' fields are already
set properly by the driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c
index bfce11cba1df..bd4a51091986 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c
@@ -108,9 +108,15 @@ static unsigned int elanfreq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
 
 
 static int elanfreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-			    unsigned int state)
+			    unsigned int index)
 {
 	/*
+	 * policy->freq_table may be sorted differently, get the index value we
+	 * are concerned about.
+	 */
+	unsigned int state = policy->freq_table[index].driver_data;
+
+	/*
 	 * Access to the Elan's internal registers is indexed via
 	 * 0x22: Chip Setup & Control Register Index Register (CSCI)
 	 * 0x23: Chip Setup & Control Register Data  Register (CSCD)
-- 
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b