From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: act8945a_charger: fix of_irq_get() error check Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:00:26 +0300 Message-ID: <9f7d4b95-dcea-d8bf-8bf4-6551d4ab7b58@cogentembedded.com> References: <20170716175244.300670810@cogentembedded.com> <20170717105003.riv7fe44jzmkffg3@earth> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42]:33726 "EHLO mail-lf0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751280AbdGQMAa (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:00:30 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f42.google.com with SMTP id z78so84199294lff.0 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 05:00:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170717105003.riv7fe44jzmkffg3@earth> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Sebastian Reichel Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Wenyou Yang Hello! On 07/17/2017 01:50 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: >> Forgot to mention that this patch is against Linus' repo as Sebastian's repo >> lags behind at 4.10-rc1... > > You are supposed to use my for-next branch [0] and not master :) That > one was 4.12-rc1 + power supply patches until a few hours ago and > now is 4.13-rc1. So if you based on current master from Linus it > should be ok. I will start reviewing patches for the v4.14 cycle > shortly. I first tried to use 'fixes' but that one was at 4.8-rc1, then switched to back to 'master'. Since this patch is a bug fix, I didn't consider for-next. > [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sre/linux-power-supply.git/log/?h=for-next > > -- Sebastian MBR, Sergei