From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] powercap/intel_rapl: Add support for Kabylake Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 16:20:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1461345439-21215-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1461345439-21215-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jacob Pan Cc: LKML , Linux PM , Rafael Wysocki , Srinivas Pandruvada List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Jacob Pan wrote: > Kabylake is similar to Skylake in terms of RAPL. > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan How urgent is this? Can we live without it in 4.6 in particular? > --- > drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c > index 8fad0a7..470bb62 100644 > --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c > +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c > @@ -1101,6 +1101,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_ids[] __initconst = { > RAPL_CPU(0X5C, rapl_defaults_core),/* Broxton */ > RAPL_CPU(0x5E, rapl_defaults_core),/* Skylake-H/S */ > RAPL_CPU(0x57, rapl_defaults_hsw_server),/* Knights Landing */ > + RAPL_CPU(0x8E, rapl_defaults_core),/* Kabylake */ > + RAPL_CPU(0x9E, rapl_defaults_core),/* Kabylake */ > {} > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, rapl_ids); > -- > 1.9.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html