From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: use correct values of cpus in __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish() Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:13:03 +0530 Message-ID: References: <52316A40.4050600@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5076102.HGJgP9ualc@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]:51263 "EHLO mail-ob0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753061Ab3ILKnF (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:43:05 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wn1so321943obc.24 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 03:43:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5076102.HGJgP9ualc@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , Stephen Warren , Lists linaro-kernel , Patch Tracking , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List On 12 September 2013 16:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Please resend. And I honestly don't think that [1-3/5] are fixes and > [4/5] is not needed any more. Okay, I will resend 5/5.. I didn't get you last two statements clearly :( - don't think that [1-3/5] are fixes: You meant they are cleanups rather? Yes, and that's why I asked you to take those on for 3.13 and not for 12.. - [4/5] is not needed any more: 4/5 is already applied by you and it came from Rafael.. I reinvented the wheel, nothing more. And so it is not required anymore :)