linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: rjw@sisk.pl
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
	cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	l.majewski@samsung.com, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] cpufreq: Re-arrange declarations in cpufreq.h
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 22:43:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomVKac+1c7rNseUKM_RCVaNiFsaioJuW98oLJP5atSaSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c685424014a84ad05ee55b669a6cda1c8c66723e.1375530162.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On 3 August 2013 17:19, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> They are pretty much mixed up. Although generic headers are present but
> definitions/declarations are present outside them too..
>
> This patch just moves stuff up and down to make it look better and consistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h | 370 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 177 insertions(+), 193 deletions(-)

Fixup due to compilation reported by Fengguang's kbuild system:
[Will post the series again once I receive more comments on it]

diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index a6b97e2..d568f39 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -268,6 +268,19 @@ int cpufreq_unregister_notifier(struct
notifier_block *nb, unsigned int list);
 void cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs, unsigned int state);

+#else /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
+static inline int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
+                                               unsigned int list)
+{
+       return 0;
+}
+static inline int cpufreq_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
+                                               unsigned int list)
+{
+       return 0;
+}
+#endif /* !CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
+
 /**
  * cpufreq_scale - "old * mult / div" calculation for large values (32-bit-arch
  * safe)
@@ -282,32 +295,16 @@ static inline unsigned long
cpufreq_scale(unsigned long old, u_int div,
                u_int mult)
 {
 #if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
-
        u64 result = ((u64) old) * ((u64) mult);
        do_div(result, div);
        return (unsigned long) result;

 #elif BITS_PER_LONG == 64
-
        unsigned long result = old * ((u64) mult);
        result /= div;
        return result;
-
 #endif
-};
-
-#else /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
-static inline int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
-                                               unsigned int list)
-{
-       return 0;
 }
-static inline int cpufreq_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
-                                               unsigned int list)
-{
-       return 0;
-}
-#endif /* !CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */

 /*********************************************************************
  *                          CPUFREQ GOVERNORS                        *

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-03 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-03 11:49 [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12 Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 01/10] cpufreq: Cleanup header files included in core Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 17:15   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 21:42     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 02/10] cpufreq: Re-arrange declarations in cpufreq.h Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 17:13   ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2013-08-03 21:43     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: Give consistent names for struct cpufreq_policy * Viresh Kumar
2013-08-06 13:38   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-06 14:02     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] cpufreq: Use sizeof(*ptr) form for finding size of a struct Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] cpufreq: Pass policy to cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] cpufreq: Store cpufreq policies in a list Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: Use cpufreq_policy_list for iterating over policies Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] cpufreq: Fix broken usage of governor->owner's refcount Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 12:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 13:27     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 22:06       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] cpufreq: Don't use cpufreq_driver->owner's refcount to protect critical sections Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq: Remove struct cpufreq_driver's owner field Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 12:07 ` [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12 Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 13:28   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 22:02     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKohpomVKac+1c7rNseUKM_RCVaNiFsaioJuW98oLJP5atSaSg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=l.majewski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).