From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sundar Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 2/4] thermal: Add generic cpufreq cooling implementation Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:15:03 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1329905650-30161-1-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@linaro.org> <1329905650-30161-3-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Amit Kachhap Cc: mark.gross@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rob.lee@linaro.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi Amit, Thanks for the replies. One more query On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Amit Kachhap wrote: >> "Different cpu related cooling devices": Do you mean cooling devices >> for different CPUs (num_cpus) or are you referring to different >> customers aka consumer drivers who could use this framework and impose >> the cooling. > Correct but the consumer driver only has to use the other > thermal-sys.c functions. Only register cpu cooling devices is > implemented in this work. Am i right in noting that this framework then doesnt handle other devices for cooling like Graphics, LCD etc? Cheers! -- --------- The views expressed in this email are personal and do not necessarily echo my employers.