From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:24:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1434362256-239992-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1434362256-239992-7-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20150624113144.GL15013@x1> <1436173803.8279.1.camel@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181]:35735 "EHLO mail-ob0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750967AbbGFJYV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:24:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1436173803.8279.1.camel@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Lee Jones , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux PM list , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Vinod Koul , Andrew Morton , Mika Westerberg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Heikki Krogerus , Jarkko Nikula , "Wysocki, Rafael J" , Mike Turquette On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> >> > The newly introduced device_for_each_child_reverse() would be used >> > when MFD >> > core removes the device. >> > >> > After this patch applied the devices will be removed in a reversed >> > order. This >> > behaviour is useful when devices have implicit dependency on order= , >> > i.e. >> > consider MFD device with serial bus controller, such as SPI, and >> > DMA IP that is >> > attached to serial bus controller: before remove the DMA driver we >> > have to be >> > ensured that no DMA transfers is ongoing and the requested channel >> > are unused. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko >> > --- >> > drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 2 +- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> Applied, thanks. > > Hmm=E2=80=A6 Seems kinda mistake. I can't see this applied (and requi= red > previous patches 4 and 5) to any of your branch neither in (today's) > linux-next. New stuff applied after v4.1 couldn't show up in -next before v4.2-rc1 = was released (which just happened last night)? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-= m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker= =2E But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something li= ke that. -- Linus Torvalds