From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amit Kucheria Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] thermal: tsens: Add generic support for TSENS v2 IP Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 10:42:10 +0530 Message-ID: References: <278b59d6a25f874a087995368cecec2572b5be89.1531135999.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Doug Anderson Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rajendra Nayak , linux-arm-msm , Bjorn Andersson , Eduardo Valentin , smohanad@codeaurora.org, Vivek Gautam , Andy Gross , Zhang Rui , Kees Cook , Rob Herring , Linux PM list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:10 AM Doug Anderson wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > > SDM845 uses v2 of the TSENS IP block but the get_temp() function > > appears to be identical across v2.x.y in code seen so far. We use the > > generic get_temp() function defined as part of ops_generic_v2. > > > > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria > > --- > > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c | 6 +++++- > > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 3 +++ > > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h | 5 ++++- > > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c > > index 34ba6c7..f40150f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c > > @@ -69,8 +69,12 @@ static const struct tsens_ops ops_generic_v2 = { > > .get_temp = get_temp_tsens_v2, > > }; > > > > +const struct tsens_data data_tsens_v2 = { > > + .ops = &ops_generic_v2, > > +}; > > + > > +/* Kept around for backward compatibility with old msm8996.dtsi */ > > const struct tsens_data data_8996 = { > > .num_sensors = 13, > > .ops = &ops_generic_v2, > > }; > > Something seems fishy here. You have a ".num_sensors" for sdm8996 > hardcoded to 13 but you don't have a ".num_sensors" for your new v2. > Where does num_sensors get set for everyone else? In patch #3 you > have a new "#qcom,sensors" but: > > 1. Nothing reads this as far as I can tell, so that means everyone > will end up with 0 sensors. > > 2. On your 2nd block of sensors in the sdm8996 device tree (see > earlier patch in the series) you try to set qcom,sensors to 8. ...but > since you still have a compatible of "qcom,msm8996-tsens" you'll get > 13. That seems wrong. ...or did I miss something? Refer to commit 6d7c70d1cd6 (thermal: qcom: tsens: Allow number of sensors to come from DT) merged earlier. #qcom,sensors will override the platform data if defined.