From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Linux PM List <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sergio Luis <sergio@larces.uece.br>,
Lauro Salmito <laurosalmito@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <damm@igel.co.jp>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) regarding restoring processor state
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:39:01 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu Jun 11 23:25:58 CEST 2009 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <S4AoGnG.A.vF.AcYMKB@chimera> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0615007ad8090a890586d530b5d3bb98da566014.1244752872.git.rjw@sisk.pl>
From: Sergio Luis <sergio@larces.uece.br>
In this step we do unify cpu_32.c and cpu_64.c functions that
work on restoring the saved processor state. Also, we do
eliminate the forward declaration of fix_processor_context()
for X86_64, as it's not needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: Sergio Luis <sergio@larces.uece.br>
Signed-off-by: Lauro Salmito <laurosalmito@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/power/cpu_64.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c b/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c
index 294e78b..29b9c0a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c
@@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ unsigned long saved_context_esi, saved_context_edi;
unsigned long saved_context_eflags;
#else
/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
-static void fix_processor_context(void);
-
struct saved_context saved_context;
#endif
@@ -136,6 +134,11 @@ static void fix_processor_context(void)
* similar stupidity.
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu)[GDT_ENTRY_TSS].type = 9;
+
+ syscall_init(); /* This sets MSR_*STAR and related */
+#endif
load_TR_desc(); /* This does ltr */
load_LDT(¤t->active_mm->context); /* This does lldt */
@@ -143,6 +146,7 @@ static void fix_processor_context(void)
* Now maybe reload the debug registers
*/
if (current->thread.debugreg7) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg0, 0);
set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg1, 1);
set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg2, 2);
@@ -150,18 +154,40 @@ static void fix_processor_context(void)
/* no 4 and 5 */
set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg6, 6);
set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg7, 7);
+#else
+ /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
+ loaddebug(¤t->thread, 0);
+ loaddebug(¤t->thread, 1);
+ loaddebug(¤t->thread, 2);
+ loaddebug(¤t->thread, 3);
+ /* no 4 and 5 */
+ loaddebug(¤t->thread, 6);
+ loaddebug(¤t->thread, 7);
+#endif
}
}
+/**
+ * __restore_processor_state - restore the contents of CPU registers saved
+ * by __save_processor_state()
+ * @ctxt - structure to load the registers contents from
+ */
static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
{
/*
* control registers
*/
/* cr4 was introduced in the Pentium CPU */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
if (ctxt->cr4)
write_cr4(ctxt->cr4);
+#else
+/* CONFIG X86_64 */
+ wrmsrl(MSR_EFER, ctxt->efer);
+ write_cr8(ctxt->cr8);
+ write_cr4(ctxt->cr4);
+#endif
write_cr3(ctxt->cr3);
write_cr2(ctxt->cr2);
write_cr0(ctxt->cr0);
@@ -170,12 +196,19 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
* now restore the descriptor tables to their proper values
* ltr is done i fix_processor_context().
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
load_gdt(&ctxt->gdt);
load_idt(&ctxt->idt);
+#else
+/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
+ load_gdt((const struct desc_ptr *)&ctxt->gdt_limit);
+ load_idt((const struct desc_ptr *)&ctxt->idt_limit);
+#endif
/*
* segment registers
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
loadsegment(es, ctxt->es);
loadsegment(fs, ctxt->fs);
loadsegment(gs, ctxt->gs);
@@ -186,6 +219,18 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
*/
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEP))
enable_sep_cpu();
+#else
+/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
+ asm volatile ("movw %0, %%ds" :: "r" (ctxt->ds));
+ asm volatile ("movw %0, %%es" :: "r" (ctxt->es));
+ asm volatile ("movw %0, %%fs" :: "r" (ctxt->fs));
+ load_gs_index(ctxt->gs);
+ asm volatile ("movw %0, %%ss" :: "r" (ctxt->ss));
+
+ wrmsrl(MSR_FS_BASE, ctxt->fs_base);
+ wrmsrl(MSR_GS_BASE, ctxt->gs_base);
+ wrmsrl(MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE, ctxt->gs_kernel_base);
+#endif
/*
* restore XCR0 for xsave capable cpu's.
@@ -194,9 +239,13 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
xsetbv(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK, pcntxt_mask);
fix_processor_context();
+
do_fpu_end();
mtrr_ap_init();
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
mcheck_init(&boot_cpu_data);
+#endif
}
/* Needed by apm.c */
@@ -204,4 +253,6 @@ void restore_processor_state(void)
{
__restore_processor_state(&saved_context);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
EXPORT_SYMBOL(restore_processor_state);
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/power/cpu_64.c b/arch/x86/power/cpu_64.c
index 11ea7d0..5c8bdc0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/cpu_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu_64.c
@@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ unsigned long saved_context_esi, saved_context_edi;
unsigned long saved_context_eflags;
#else
/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
-static void fix_processor_context(void);
-
struct saved_context saved_context;
#endif
@@ -120,11 +118,57 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(save_processor_state);
static void do_fpu_end(void)
{
/*
- * Restore FPU regs if necessary
+ * Restore FPU regs if necessary.
*/
kernel_fpu_end();
}
+static void fix_processor_context(void)
+{
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ struct tss_struct *t = &per_cpu(init_tss, cpu);
+
+ set_tss_desc(cpu, t); /*
+ * This just modifies memory; should not be
+ * necessary. But... This is necessary, because
+ * 386 hardware has concept of busy TSS or some
+ * similar stupidity.
+ */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu)[GDT_ENTRY_TSS].type = 9;
+
+ syscall_init(); /* This sets MSR_*STAR and related */
+#endif
+ load_TR_desc(); /* This does ltr */
+ load_LDT(¤t->active_mm->context); /* This does lldt */
+
+ /*
+ * Now maybe reload the debug registers
+ */
+ if (current->thread.debugreg7) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+ set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg0, 0);
+ set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg1, 1);
+ set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg2, 2);
+ set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg3, 3);
+ /* no 4 and 5 */
+ set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg6, 6);
+ set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg7, 7);
+#else
+ /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
+ loaddebug(¤t->thread, 0);
+ loaddebug(¤t->thread, 1);
+ loaddebug(¤t->thread, 2);
+ loaddebug(¤t->thread, 3);
+ /* no 4 and 5 */
+ loaddebug(¤t->thread, 6);
+ loaddebug(¤t->thread, 7);
+#endif
+ }
+
+}
+
/**
* __restore_processor_state - restore the contents of CPU registers saved
* by __save_processor_state()
@@ -135,9 +179,16 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
/*
* control registers
*/
+ /* cr4 was introduced in the Pentium CPU */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+ if (ctxt->cr4)
+ write_cr4(ctxt->cr4);
+#else
+/* CONFIG X86_64 */
wrmsrl(MSR_EFER, ctxt->efer);
write_cr8(ctxt->cr8);
write_cr4(ctxt->cr4);
+#endif
write_cr3(ctxt->cr3);
write_cr2(ctxt->cr2);
write_cr0(ctxt->cr0);
@@ -146,13 +197,31 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
* now restore the descriptor tables to their proper values
* ltr is done i fix_processor_context().
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+ load_gdt(&ctxt->gdt);
+ load_idt(&ctxt->idt);
+#else
+/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
load_gdt((const struct desc_ptr *)&ctxt->gdt_limit);
load_idt((const struct desc_ptr *)&ctxt->idt_limit);
-
+#endif
/*
* segment registers
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+ loadsegment(es, ctxt->es);
+ loadsegment(fs, ctxt->fs);
+ loadsegment(gs, ctxt->gs);
+ loadsegment(ss, ctxt->ss);
+
+ /*
+ * sysenter MSRs
+ */
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEP))
+ enable_sep_cpu();
+#else
+/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
asm volatile ("movw %0, %%ds" :: "r" (ctxt->ds));
asm volatile ("movw %0, %%es" :: "r" (ctxt->es));
asm volatile ("movw %0, %%fs" :: "r" (ctxt->fs));
@@ -162,6 +231,7 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
wrmsrl(MSR_FS_BASE, ctxt->fs_base);
wrmsrl(MSR_GS_BASE, ctxt->gs_base);
wrmsrl(MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE, ctxt->gs_kernel_base);
+#endif
/*
* restore XCR0 for xsave capable cpu's.
@@ -173,41 +243,17 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
do_fpu_end();
mtrr_ap_init();
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+ mcheck_init(&boot_cpu_data);
+#endif
}
+/* Needed by apm.c */
void restore_processor_state(void)
{
__restore_processor_state(&saved_context);
}
-
-static void fix_processor_context(void)
-{
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- struct tss_struct *t = &per_cpu(init_tss, cpu);
-
- /*
- * This just modifies memory; should not be necessary. But... This
- * is necessary, because 386 hardware has concept of busy TSS or some
- * similar stupidity.
- */
- set_tss_desc(cpu, t);
-
- get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu)[GDT_ENTRY_TSS].type = 9;
-
- syscall_init(); /* This sets MSR_*STAR and related */
- load_TR_desc(); /* This does ltr */
- load_LDT(¤t->active_mm->context); /* This does lldt */
-
- /*
- * Now maybe reload the debug registers
- */
- if (current->thread.debugreg7){
- loaddebug(¤t->thread, 0);
- loaddebug(¤t->thread, 1);
- loaddebug(¤t->thread, 2);
- loaddebug(¤t->thread, 3);
- /* no 4 and 5 */
- loaddebug(¤t->thread, 6);
- loaddebug(¤t->thread, 7);
- }
-}
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(restore_processor_state);
+#endif
--
1.5.2.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-11 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-11 21:42 [PATCH 00/19] What's in the suspend tree for 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:42 ` [PATCH 01/19] PM: Warn if interrupts are enabled during suspend-resume of sysdevs Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 10:37 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-12 10:37 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 03/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) global variables Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 05/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) regarding restoring processor state Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 02/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) headers Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 04/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) regarding saving processor state Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 08/19] PM: Remove unused asm/suspend.h Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 07/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64).c Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:53 ` [PATCH 12/19] PM/Suspend: Do not shrink memory before suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:56 ` [PATCH 11/19] PM: Remove bus_type suspend_late()/resume_early() V2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:59 ` [PATCH 14/19] PM: Remove device_type suspend()/resume() Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:00 ` [PATCH 15/19] Driver Core: Rework platform suspend/resume, print warning Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:00 ` [PATCH 13/19] PM/Hibernate: Move memory shrinking to snapshot.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:01 ` [PATCH 09/19] PM: Rename device_power_down/up() Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:01 ` [PATCH 16/19] PM: Separate suspend to RAM functionality from core Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:02 ` [PATCH 10/19] PM core: rename suspend and resume functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:06 ` [PATCH 00/19] What's in the suspend tree for 2.6.31 Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:09 ` [PATCH 10/19] PM core: rename suspend and resume functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:12 ` [PATCH 18/19] PM/Hibernate: Move NVS routines into a seperate file (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:21 ` [PATCH 02/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) headers Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:21 ` [PATCH 19/19] PM: Add empty suspend/resume device irq functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:22 ` [PATCH 17/19] PM/Hibernate: Rename disk.c to hibernate.c Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <20090611220652.GA18682@elf.ucw.cz>
2009-06-11 22:24 ` [PATCH 00/19] What's in the suspend tree for 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:26 ` [PATCH 18/19] PM/Hibernate: Move NVS routines into a seperate file (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:29 ` [PATCH 02/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) headers Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 10:37 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-12 10:37 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:34 ` [PATCH 03/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) global variables Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 10:44 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:36 ` [PATCH 04/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) regarding saving processor state Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-06-11 22:47 ` [PATCH 07/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64).c Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 10:50 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:48 ` [PATCH 09/19] PM: Rename device_power_down/up() Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 10:51 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:48 ` [PATCH 10/19] PM core: rename suspend and resume functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 10:55 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:48 ` [PATCH 11/19] PM: Remove bus_type suspend_late()/resume_early() V2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:48 ` [PATCH 12/19] PM/Suspend: Do not shrink memory before suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 11:02 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20090612110235.GL18682@elf.ucw.cz>
2009-06-12 19:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 13/19] PM/Hibernate: Move memory shrinking to snapshot.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 14/19] PM: Remove device_type suspend()/resume() Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 11:03 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 15/19] Driver Core: Rework platform suspend/resume, print warning Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 11:10 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 16/19] PM: Separate suspend to RAM functionality from core Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 17/19] PM/Hibernate: Rename disk.c to hibernate.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:50 ` [PATCH 18/19] PM/Hibernate: Move NVS routines into a seperate file (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:50 ` [PATCH 19/19] PM: Add empty suspend/resume device irq functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 11:13 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20090612111317.GP18682@elf.ucw.cz>
2009-06-12 11:32 ` Heiko Carstens
[not found] ` <20090612113218.GB6355@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
2009-06-12 11:36 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 08/19] PM: Remove unused asm/suspend.h Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=S4AoGnG.A.vF.AcYMKB@chimera \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=damm@igel.co.jp \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=laurosalmito@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sergio@larces.uece.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox