public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Linux PM List <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sergio Luis <sergio@larces.uece.br>,
	Lauro Salmito <laurosalmito@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <damm@igel.co.jp>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) regarding restoring processor state
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:39:01 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu Jun 11 23:25:58 CEST 2009	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <S4AoGnG.A.vF.AcYMKB@chimera> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0615007ad8090a890586d530b5d3bb98da566014.1244752872.git.rjw@sisk.pl>

From: Sergio Luis <sergio@larces.uece.br>

In this step we do unify cpu_32.c and cpu_64.c functions that
work on restoring the saved processor state. Also, we do
eliminate the forward declaration of fix_processor_context()
for X86_64, as it's not needed anymore.

Signed-off-by: Sergio Luis <sergio@larces.uece.br>
Signed-off-by: Lauro Salmito <laurosalmito@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
 arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c |   55 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/x86/power/cpu_64.c |  118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c b/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c
index 294e78b..29b9c0a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c
@@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ unsigned long saved_context_esi, saved_context_edi;
 unsigned long saved_context_eflags;
 #else
 /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
-static void fix_processor_context(void);
-
 struct saved_context saved_context;
 #endif
 
@@ -136,6 +134,11 @@ static void fix_processor_context(void)
 				 * similar stupidity.
 				 */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+	get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu)[GDT_ENTRY_TSS].type = 9;
+
+	syscall_init();				/* This sets MSR_*STAR and related */
+#endif
 	load_TR_desc();				/* This does ltr */
 	load_LDT(&current->active_mm->context);	/* This does lldt */
 
@@ -143,6 +146,7 @@ static void fix_processor_context(void)
 	 * Now maybe reload the debug registers
 	 */
 	if (current->thread.debugreg7) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 		set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg0, 0);
 		set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg1, 1);
 		set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg2, 2);
@@ -150,18 +154,40 @@ static void fix_processor_context(void)
 		/* no 4 and 5 */
 		set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg6, 6);
 		set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg7, 7);
+#else
+		/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
+		loaddebug(&current->thread, 0);
+		loaddebug(&current->thread, 1);
+		loaddebug(&current->thread, 2);
+		loaddebug(&current->thread, 3);
+		/* no 4 and 5 */
+		loaddebug(&current->thread, 6);
+		loaddebug(&current->thread, 7);
+#endif
 	}
 
 }
 
+/**
+ *	__restore_processor_state - restore the contents of CPU registers saved
+ *		by __save_processor_state()
+ *	@ctxt - structure to load the registers contents from
+ */
 static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
 {
 	/*
 	 * control registers
 	 */
 	/* cr4 was introduced in the Pentium CPU */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 	if (ctxt->cr4)
 		write_cr4(ctxt->cr4);
+#else
+/* CONFIG X86_64 */
+	wrmsrl(MSR_EFER, ctxt->efer);
+	write_cr8(ctxt->cr8);
+	write_cr4(ctxt->cr4);
+#endif
 	write_cr3(ctxt->cr3);
 	write_cr2(ctxt->cr2);
 	write_cr0(ctxt->cr0);
@@ -170,12 +196,19 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
 	 * now restore the descriptor tables to their proper values
 	 * ltr is done i fix_processor_context().
 	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 	load_gdt(&ctxt->gdt);
 	load_idt(&ctxt->idt);
+#else
+/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
+	load_gdt((const struct desc_ptr *)&ctxt->gdt_limit);
+	load_idt((const struct desc_ptr *)&ctxt->idt_limit);
+#endif
 
 	/*
 	 * segment registers
 	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 	loadsegment(es, ctxt->es);
 	loadsegment(fs, ctxt->fs);
 	loadsegment(gs, ctxt->gs);
@@ -186,6 +219,18 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
 	 */
 	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEP))
 		enable_sep_cpu();
+#else
+/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
+	asm volatile ("movw %0, %%ds" :: "r" (ctxt->ds));
+	asm volatile ("movw %0, %%es" :: "r" (ctxt->es));
+	asm volatile ("movw %0, %%fs" :: "r" (ctxt->fs));
+	load_gs_index(ctxt->gs);
+	asm volatile ("movw %0, %%ss" :: "r" (ctxt->ss));
+
+	wrmsrl(MSR_FS_BASE, ctxt->fs_base);
+	wrmsrl(MSR_GS_BASE, ctxt->gs_base);
+	wrmsrl(MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE, ctxt->gs_kernel_base);
+#endif
 
 	/*
 	 * restore XCR0 for xsave capable cpu's.
@@ -194,9 +239,13 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
 		xsetbv(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK, pcntxt_mask);
 
 	fix_processor_context();
+
 	do_fpu_end();
 	mtrr_ap_init();
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 	mcheck_init(&boot_cpu_data);
+#endif
 }
 
 /* Needed by apm.c */
@@ -204,4 +253,6 @@ void restore_processor_state(void)
 {
 	__restore_processor_state(&saved_context);
 }
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(restore_processor_state);
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/power/cpu_64.c b/arch/x86/power/cpu_64.c
index 11ea7d0..5c8bdc0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/cpu_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu_64.c
@@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ unsigned long saved_context_esi, saved_context_edi;
 unsigned long saved_context_eflags;
 #else
 /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
-static void fix_processor_context(void);
-
 struct saved_context saved_context;
 #endif
 
@@ -120,11 +118,57 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(save_processor_state);
 static void do_fpu_end(void)
 {
 	/*
-	 * Restore FPU regs if necessary
+	 * Restore FPU regs if necessary.
 	 */
 	kernel_fpu_end();
 }
 
+static void fix_processor_context(void)
+{
+	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	struct tss_struct *t = &per_cpu(init_tss, cpu);
+
+	set_tss_desc(cpu, t);	/*
+				 * This just modifies memory; should not be
+				 * necessary. But... This is necessary, because
+				 * 386 hardware has concept of busy TSS or some
+				 * similar stupidity.
+				 */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+	get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu)[GDT_ENTRY_TSS].type = 9;
+
+	syscall_init();				/* This sets MSR_*STAR and related */
+#endif
+	load_TR_desc();				/* This does ltr */
+	load_LDT(&current->active_mm->context);	/* This does lldt */
+
+	/*
+	 * Now maybe reload the debug registers
+	 */
+	if (current->thread.debugreg7) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+		set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg0, 0);
+		set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg1, 1);
+		set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg2, 2);
+		set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg3, 3);
+		/* no 4 and 5 */
+		set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg6, 6);
+		set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg7, 7);
+#else
+		/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
+		loaddebug(&current->thread, 0);
+		loaddebug(&current->thread, 1);
+		loaddebug(&current->thread, 2);
+		loaddebug(&current->thread, 3);
+		/* no 4 and 5 */
+		loaddebug(&current->thread, 6);
+		loaddebug(&current->thread, 7);
+#endif
+	}
+
+}
+
 /**
  *	__restore_processor_state - restore the contents of CPU registers saved
  *		by __save_processor_state()
@@ -135,9 +179,16 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
 	/*
 	 * control registers
 	 */
+	/* cr4 was introduced in the Pentium CPU */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+	if (ctxt->cr4)
+		write_cr4(ctxt->cr4);
+#else
+/* CONFIG X86_64 */
 	wrmsrl(MSR_EFER, ctxt->efer);
 	write_cr8(ctxt->cr8);
 	write_cr4(ctxt->cr4);
+#endif
 	write_cr3(ctxt->cr3);
 	write_cr2(ctxt->cr2);
 	write_cr0(ctxt->cr0);
@@ -146,13 +197,31 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
 	 * now restore the descriptor tables to their proper values
 	 * ltr is done i fix_processor_context().
 	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+	load_gdt(&ctxt->gdt);
+	load_idt(&ctxt->idt);
+#else
+/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
 	load_gdt((const struct desc_ptr *)&ctxt->gdt_limit);
 	load_idt((const struct desc_ptr *)&ctxt->idt_limit);
-
+#endif
 
 	/*
 	 * segment registers
 	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+	loadsegment(es, ctxt->es);
+	loadsegment(fs, ctxt->fs);
+	loadsegment(gs, ctxt->gs);
+	loadsegment(ss, ctxt->ss);
+
+	/*
+	 * sysenter MSRs
+	 */
+	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEP))
+		enable_sep_cpu();
+#else
+/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
 	asm volatile ("movw %0, %%ds" :: "r" (ctxt->ds));
 	asm volatile ("movw %0, %%es" :: "r" (ctxt->es));
 	asm volatile ("movw %0, %%fs" :: "r" (ctxt->fs));
@@ -162,6 +231,7 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
 	wrmsrl(MSR_FS_BASE, ctxt->fs_base);
 	wrmsrl(MSR_GS_BASE, ctxt->gs_base);
 	wrmsrl(MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE, ctxt->gs_kernel_base);
+#endif
 
 	/*
 	 * restore XCR0 for xsave capable cpu's.
@@ -173,41 +243,17 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
 
 	do_fpu_end();
 	mtrr_ap_init();
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+	mcheck_init(&boot_cpu_data);
+#endif
 }
 
+/* Needed by apm.c */
 void restore_processor_state(void)
 {
 	__restore_processor_state(&saved_context);
 }
-
-static void fix_processor_context(void)
-{
-	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	struct tss_struct *t = &per_cpu(init_tss, cpu);
-
-	/*
-	 * This just modifies memory; should not be necessary. But... This
-	 * is necessary, because 386 hardware has concept of busy TSS or some
-	 * similar stupidity.
-	 */
-	set_tss_desc(cpu, t);
-
-	get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu)[GDT_ENTRY_TSS].type = 9;
-
-	syscall_init();                         /* This sets MSR_*STAR and related */
-	load_TR_desc();				/* This does ltr */
-	load_LDT(&current->active_mm->context);	/* This does lldt */
-
-	/*
-	 * Now maybe reload the debug registers
-	 */
-	if (current->thread.debugreg7){
-                loaddebug(&current->thread, 0);
-                loaddebug(&current->thread, 1);
-                loaddebug(&current->thread, 2);
-                loaddebug(&current->thread, 3);
-                /* no 4 and 5 */
-                loaddebug(&current->thread, 6);
-                loaddebug(&current->thread, 7);
-	}
-}
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(restore_processor_state);
+#endif
-- 
1.5.2.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-11 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-11 21:42 [PATCH 00/19] What's in the suspend tree for 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:42 ` [PATCH 01/19] PM: Warn if interrupts are enabled during suspend-resume of sysdevs Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 10:37   ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-12 10:37   ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 03/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) global variables Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 05/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) regarding restoring processor state Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 02/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) headers Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 04/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) regarding saving processor state Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 08/19] PM: Remove unused asm/suspend.h Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 07/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64).c Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:53 ` [PATCH 12/19] PM/Suspend: Do not shrink memory before suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:56 ` [PATCH 11/19] PM: Remove bus_type suspend_late()/resume_early() V2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 21:59 ` [PATCH 14/19] PM: Remove device_type suspend()/resume() Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:00 ` [PATCH 15/19] Driver Core: Rework platform suspend/resume, print warning Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:00 ` [PATCH 13/19] PM/Hibernate: Move memory shrinking to snapshot.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:01 ` [PATCH 09/19] PM: Rename device_power_down/up() Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:01 ` [PATCH 16/19] PM: Separate suspend to RAM functionality from core Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:02 ` [PATCH 10/19] PM core: rename suspend and resume functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:06 ` [PATCH 00/19] What's in the suspend tree for 2.6.31 Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:09 ` [PATCH 10/19] PM core: rename suspend and resume functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:12 ` [PATCH 18/19] PM/Hibernate: Move NVS routines into a seperate file (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:21 ` [PATCH 02/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) headers Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:21 ` [PATCH 19/19] PM: Add empty suspend/resume device irq functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:22 ` [PATCH 17/19] PM/Hibernate: Rename disk.c to hibernate.c Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found] ` <20090611220652.GA18682@elf.ucw.cz>
2009-06-11 22:24   ` [PATCH 00/19] What's in the suspend tree for 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:26 ` [PATCH 18/19] PM/Hibernate: Move NVS routines into a seperate file (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:29 ` [PATCH 02/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) headers Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 10:37   ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-12 10:37   ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:34 ` [PATCH 03/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) global variables Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 10:44   ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:36 ` [PATCH 04/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64) regarding saving processor state Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-06-11 22:47 ` [PATCH 07/19] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64).c Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 10:50   ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:48 ` [PATCH 09/19] PM: Rename device_power_down/up() Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 10:51   ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:48 ` [PATCH 10/19] PM core: rename suspend and resume functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 10:55   ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:48 ` [PATCH 11/19] PM: Remove bus_type suspend_late()/resume_early() V2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:48 ` [PATCH 12/19] PM/Suspend: Do not shrink memory before suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 11:02   ` Pavel Machek
     [not found]   ` <20090612110235.GL18682@elf.ucw.cz>
2009-06-12 19:04     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 13/19] PM/Hibernate: Move memory shrinking to snapshot.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 14/19] PM: Remove device_type suspend()/resume() Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 11:03   ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 15/19] Driver Core: Rework platform suspend/resume, print warning Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 11:10   ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 16/19] PM: Separate suspend to RAM functionality from core Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 17/19] PM/Hibernate: Rename disk.c to hibernate.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:50 ` [PATCH 18/19] PM/Hibernate: Move NVS routines into a seperate file (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-11 22:50 ` [PATCH 19/19] PM: Add empty suspend/resume device irq functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-12 11:13   ` Pavel Machek
     [not found]   ` <20090612111317.GP18682@elf.ucw.cz>
2009-06-12 11:32     ` Heiko Carstens
     [not found]     ` <20090612113218.GB6355@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
2009-06-12 11:36       ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 08/19] PM: Remove unused asm/suspend.h Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=S4AoGnG.A.vF.AcYMKB@chimera \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=damm@igel.co.jp \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
    --cc=laurosalmito@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sergio@larces.uece.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox