From: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] PM / Domains: add domain feature flag for next wakeup
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 08:54:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/M6KheIV5ES68V1@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFr0+Hzod+cq1gBN66O-Tvt5RAB2aK=rzcqGaPF41TMRnQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 22 2020 at 06:07 -0700, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 23:51, Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> PM domains may support entering multiple power down states when the
>> component devices and sub-domains are suspended. Also, they may specify
>> the residency value for an idle state, only after which the idle state
>> may provide power benefits. If the domain does not specify the residency
>> for any of its idle states, the governor's choice is much simplified.
>>
>> Let's make this optional with the use of a PM domain feature flag.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> Changes in v6:
>> - New patch based on discussions on v5 of the series
>> ---
>> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/pm_domain.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> index 1b0c9ccbbe1f..1e6c0bf1c945 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> @@ -1748,6 +1748,24 @@ int dev_pm_genpd_remove_notifier(struct device *dev)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_genpd_remove_notifier);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * genpd_enable_next_wakeup - Enable genpd gov to use next_wakeup
>> + *
>> + * @genpd: The genpd to be updated
>> + * @enable: Enable/disable genpd gov to use next wakeup
>> + */
>> +void genpd_enable_next_wakeup(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + genpd_lock(genpd);
>> + if (enable)
>> + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_GOV_NEXT_WAKEUP;
>> + else
>> + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_GOV_NEXT_WAKEUP;
>> + genpd->next_wakeup = KTIME_MAX;
>> + genpd_unlock(genpd);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(genpd_enable_next_wakeup);
>> +
>
>Please drop this, as I don't think we need a dedicated function to
>enable this feature.
>
Ah, I responded to the patch #2 regarding this before reading this
email.
>Instead, it seems like a better idea to let the genpd provider set it,
>before it calls pm_genpd_init(), along with its other genpd
>configurations.
>
If we no longer have a need for this feature in the domain, we could
dynamically disable it.
>> static int genpd_add_subdomain(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
>> struct generic_pm_domain *subdomain)
>> {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_domain.h b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
>> index 2ca919ae8d36..1f359bd19f77 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pm_domain.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
>> @@ -55,13 +55,19 @@
>> *
>> * GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON: Instructs genpd to always keep the PM domain
>> * powered on except for system suspend.
>> + *
>> + * GENPD_FLAG_GOV_NEXT_WAKEUP: Enable the genpd governor to consider its
>> + * components' next wakeup when determining the
>> + * optimal idle state. This is setup only if the
>> + * domain's idle state specifies a residency.
>> */
>> -#define GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK (1U << 0)
>> -#define GENPD_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE (1U << 1)
>> -#define GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON (1U << 2)
>> -#define GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP (1U << 3)
>> -#define GENPD_FLAG_CPU_DOMAIN (1U << 4)
>> -#define GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON (1U << 5)
>> +#define GENPD_FLAG_PM_CLK (1U << 0)
>> +#define GENPD_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE (1U << 1)
>> +#define GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON (1U << 2)
>> +#define GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP (1U << 3)
>> +#define GENPD_FLAG_CPU_DOMAIN (1U << 4)
>> +#define GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON (1U << 5)
>> +#define GENPD_FLAG_GOV_NEXT_WAKEUP (1U << 6)
>
>Nitpick.
>
>To me, the configuration is something that corresponds to the genpd,
>rather than the governor (even if it affects it in this case). That
>said, how about just naming the flag something like
>"GENPD_FLAG_MIN_RESIDENCY", as to indicate that the genpd's power off
>states have minimum residencies values that may deserve to be
>considered, while power off.
>
Hmmm..
>>
>> enum gpd_status {
>> GENPD_STATE_ON = 0, /* PM domain is on */
>> @@ -205,6 +211,11 @@ static inline struct generic_pm_domain_data *dev_gpd_data(struct device *dev)
>> return to_gpd_data(dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data);
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool genpd_may_use_next_wakeup(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>> +{
>> + return genpd->flags & GENPD_FLAG_GOV_NEXT_WAKEUP;
>> +}
>
>This can probably be moved into drivers/base/power/domain_governor.c.
>
Okay.
>> +
>> int pm_genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev);
>> int pm_genpd_remove_device(struct device *dev);
>> int pm_genpd_add_subdomain(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
>> @@ -217,6 +228,7 @@ int pm_genpd_remove(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd);
>> int dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(struct device *dev, unsigned int state);
>> int dev_pm_genpd_add_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block *nb);
>> int dev_pm_genpd_remove_notifier(struct device *dev);
>> +void genpd_enable_next_wakeup(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool enable);
>>
>> extern struct dev_power_governor simple_qos_governor;
>> extern struct dev_power_governor pm_domain_always_on_gov;
>> @@ -275,6 +287,10 @@ static inline int dev_pm_genpd_remove_notifier(struct device *dev)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>>
>> +static void genpd_enable_next_wakeup(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
>> + bool enable)
>> +{ }
>> +
>> #define simple_qos_governor (*(struct dev_power_governor *)(NULL))
>> #define pm_domain_always_on_gov (*(struct dev_power_governor *)(NULL))
>> #endif
>> --
>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
>> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>>
>
>Kind regards
>Uffe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-30 22:50 [PATCH v6 0/3] Better domain idle from device wakeup patterns Lina Iyer
2020-11-30 22:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] PM / Domains: add domain feature flag for next wakeup Lina Iyer
2020-12-22 13:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2021-01-04 15:54 ` Lina Iyer [this message]
2020-11-30 22:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] PM / domains: inform PM domain of a device's " Lina Iyer
2020-12-22 13:09 ` Ulf Hansson
2021-01-04 15:43 ` Lina Iyer
2021-01-08 10:07 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-11-30 22:50 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] PM / Domains: use device's next wakeup to determine domain idle state Lina Iyer
2020-12-22 14:41 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-12-08 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Better domain idle from device wakeup patterns Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-09 10:36 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-12-09 15:18 ` Lina Iyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X/M6KheIV5ES68V1@codeaurora.org \
--to=ilina@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).