From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBF2C4332F for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 11:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229618AbiCQLow (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2022 07:44:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40054 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232562AbiCQLov (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2022 07:44:51 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CDFC56773; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 04:43:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1647517415; x=1679053415; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=izMyFSd/6/exTcmhx8kxg+WRK3vb/oe1G6XfehxbOcw=; b=bamGKhWgR22flfkrNChcQ9UNGjblXG8A4DjIUq2qRnkAlIzLUVXtT5Wg aqgz/zzyV8Me+aag4xKN4PQb7hmTr/gHcKvQsgLInh+qRXY/xNM1uQfs/ qZY+Mib8TRmOx23hs9MCMqivXK9ia7ZvvrX435uXa6nku/92E1D94qTw1 Iq6AtF4p3aKwNkZMyxFDDkJAMor8FzFiRZFVYI49n7Nn2g6IQ3C6aGvRg BoYlziYSY5uL+Ld3tHnV2HiQFp9Z/PbUQpfKjbQpAeRc0SFDlC514uQBo xd9DB4UhEHPOXae36sK9w4To4EfH9LxM2FQ9rgf+T45reWrsWEKF16NPY Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10288"; a="254402656" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,188,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="254402656" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Mar 2022 04:43:34 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,188,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="513397834" Received: from lahna.fi.intel.com (HELO lahna) ([10.237.72.162]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Mar 2022 04:43:31 -0700 Received: by lahna (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:43:29 +0200 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:43:29 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux ACPI , Linux PM , LKML , Hans de Goede , Mario Limonciello Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: bus: Fix platform-level _OSC handling and avoid CPPC is not supported Message-ID: References: <4734682.31r3eYUQgx@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4734682.31r3eYUQgx@kreacher> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi Rafael, On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 01:35:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi All, > > The following two patches revert a commit that caused the handling of > platform-level _OSC to fail in some legitimate cases and address the > CPPC handling breakage that was the motivation for the reverted commit. > > Please refer to the patch changelogs for details. For both, Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg