From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44754C43334 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 15:41:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344576AbiFIPlF (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2022 11:41:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38822 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236178AbiFIPlE (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2022 11:41:04 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CBF91C5915; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 08:41:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1654789263; x=1686325263; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=L2HFR+cNA9oe1wo8qYpDqHV/TYkzOI48bE6rdd6UD88=; b=dXJ6baYpGCZZKcTj3SttjzGyGkaxcJ+mB9qaSSbT84di0KrAsD/oNzpl v7ABzkgYHQKdDWdMMgFmATT68QfhrgAePxS552zpIM35cMVIRdlQ4z+iR wuDhzz1HvsHrZAoN/4Oy8H45B+d2/wxpSAbmU7zIi5rpiF6I0rcC80SBA fXkAa7lIyLsKkyeSY2zj76+ZqpBaF5RkcsiI6nnfR9hN9QHH+85fqKq6p CPAhoB9+xMxRabKo6qdPogaInJVzNWV7HyfoNkklwPdgnfKOMeel9erVy 8B1DhwSdOijPyKUAsgUUMzN5MM0FZVN7el5XWbnqaMGM5Od5gALbI5d4T A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10373"; a="278469195" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,287,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="278469195" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jun 2022 08:41:03 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,287,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="760110181" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jun 2022 08:41:01 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1nzKHK-000XzE-3M; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 18:40:58 +0300 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 18:40:57 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux ACPI , LKML , Linux PM , Mika Westerberg , Hans de Goede , Sakari Ailus Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 10/16] ACPI: bus: Introduce acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse() Message-ID: References: <1843211.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher> <2137459.Mh6RI2rZIc@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2137459.Mh6RI2rZIc@kreacher> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 04:06:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Make it possible to walk the children of an ACPI device in the revese > order by defining acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse() in analogy with > acpi_dev_for_each_child(). ... > + return device_for_each_child_reverse(&adev->dev, &adwc, > + acpi_dev_for_one_check); Perhaps one line? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko