From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: Expose voltage info in debugfs for OPPs w/out explicit regulators
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 10:56:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwkJPMaDjhHtEx2O@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220826075655.1.I2e4958048f30c3b44a01e31519092f7d3c9204e4@changeid>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 07:56:59AM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> On some cpufreq drivers we know the voltage associated with each
> operating point but there is no explicit Linux "regulator" present. An
> example is "qcom-cpufreq-hw.c". There the voltage is managed
> automatically by the hardware but we still associate it with the OPP
> table so we can do energy calculations for EAS.
>
> The OPP framework handles this in general. In _opp_allocate() it can
> be seen that we always allocate space for one supply even if
> "regulator_count" is 0.
>
> Let's handle this properly in debugfs.
>
> NOTE: as a side effect of this a whole bunch of OPPs in the system may
> get supply-related files exposed in debugfs that are mostly useless
> (they'll just contain 0). I'd expect this to be OK but it's moderately
> annoying. It seems better than trying to dynamically create debugfs
> directories when the voltages are non-zero or adding extra complexity
> in the code giving a hint to the OPP framework that voltages should be
> exposed.
>
> After this patch, on a sc7180-trogdor class device I can see voltages
> for the CPU OPPs under /sys/kernel/debug/opp.
>
> Fixes: dfbe4678d709 ("PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators")
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-26 14:56 [PATCH] opp: Expose voltage info in debugfs for OPPs w/out explicit regulators Douglas Anderson
2022-08-26 17:56 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2022-08-30 5:23 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwkJPMaDjhHtEx2O@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).