From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] power: supply: avoid nullptr deref in __power_supply_is_system_supplied
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 11:45:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yx8N0hGNcbVPnJxW@zx2c4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220911123346.a7xbzdlbb7r5p6ih@mercury.elektranox.org>
Hi Sebastian,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 02:33:46PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > - if (psy->desc->type != POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_BATTERY)
> > + if (psy->desc->type != POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_BATTERY && psy->desc->get_property)
> > if (!psy->desc->get_property(psy, POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ONLINE,
> > &ret))
> > return ret.intval;
>
> Thanks, queued into power-supply's fixes branch. But I'm curioous
> how you triggered this. Which power-supply driver does not add
> a get_property function?
AFAIK, I'm just using the normal ACPI one. Really nothing fancy.
Thinkpad X1 Extreme Gen 4.
Maybe get_property was being set and unset during some kind of
initialization/deinitialization that was happening in response to some
other event? Not sure, except that I managed to trigger it twice before
patching my kernel so my laptop would keep working.
My machine went through three changes I know about between the threshold
of "not crashing" and "crashing":
- Upgraded to 5.19 and then 6.0-rc1.
- I used my laptop on batteries for a prolonged period of time for the
first time in a while.
- I updated KDE, whose power management UI elements may or may not make
frequent calls to this subsystem to update some visual representation.
I don't have any data to back up this claim at all, but something that
at least _sounds_ plausible is that an updated KDE thing was hammering
on this read() method, while a decreasing battery state caused some
aspect of the subsystem to reinitialize the power management object,
making ->get_property() temporarily NULL. But just a guess!
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-12 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAHmME9pQ5v5afkcCXtCYc1PLKKbnQJp=mc9gtdF+DBvFbKDPYw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20220829152827.2726-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
2022-08-29 15:46 ` [PATCH] power: supply: avoid nullptr deref in __power_supply_is_system_supplied Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-09-05 17:24 ` [PATCH RESEND] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-09-11 12:33 ` Sebastian Reichel
2022-09-12 10:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2022-09-12 10:48 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-09-12 10:56 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
[not found] ` <TYZPR03MB599467EF3E0F17E72DF47E86BD449@TYZPR03MB5994.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
2022-09-12 12:44 ` Mark Pearson
2022-09-12 17:12 ` Sebastian Reichel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yx8N0hGNcbVPnJxW@zx2c4.com \
--to=jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox