From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
To: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
Cc: mario.limonciello@amd.com, rafael@kernel.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Use scope based cleanup for cpufreq_policy refs
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:41:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6ne2MUPwl5fcxRb@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205112523.201101-12-dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:25:22AM +0000, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> There have been instances in past where refcount decrementing is missed
> while exiting a function. Use automatic scope based cleanup to avoid
> such errors.
This is a nice fix! I wonder if this can be used in other parts
of cpufreq. Did you check if there are other cpufreq drivers/governors
where we can use this destructor?
Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 25 ++++++++-----------------
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 6a604f0797d9..ee7e3f0a4c0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static inline bool amd_pstate_sample(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> static void amd_pstate_update(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata, u8 min_perf,
> u8 des_perf, u8 max_perf, bool fast_switch, int gov_flags)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
> u8 nominal_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf);
>
> if (!policy)
> @@ -574,8 +574,6 @@ static void amd_pstate_update(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata, u8 min_perf,
> }
>
> amd_pstate_update_perf(cpudata, min_perf, des_perf, max_perf, 0, fast_switch);
> -
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> }
>
> static int amd_pstate_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy_data)
> @@ -587,7 +585,8 @@ static int amd_pstate_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy_data)
> * amd-pstate qos_requests.
> */
> if (policy_data->min == FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE) {
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(policy_data->cpu);
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) =
> + cpufreq_cpu_get(policy_data->cpu);
> struct amd_cpudata *cpudata;
>
> if (!policy)
> @@ -595,7 +594,6 @@ static int amd_pstate_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy_data)
>
> cpudata = policy->driver_data;
> policy_data->min = cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq;
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> }
>
> cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy_data);
> @@ -678,7 +676,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu,
> unsigned long capacity)
> {
> u8 max_perf, min_perf, des_perf, cap_perf, min_limit_perf;
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> struct amd_cpudata *cpudata;
>
> if (!policy)
> @@ -710,7 +708,6 @@ static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu,
>
> amd_pstate_update(cpudata, min_perf, des_perf, max_perf, true,
> policy->governor->flags);
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> }
>
> static int amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool on)
> @@ -824,28 +821,23 @@ static void amd_pstate_init_prefcore(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
>
> static void amd_pstate_update_limits(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> struct amd_cpudata *cpudata;
> u32 prev_high = 0, cur_high = 0;
> - int ret;
> bool highest_perf_changed = false;
>
> if (!amd_pstate_prefcore)
> return;
>
> - policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> if (!policy)
> return;
>
> - cpudata = policy->driver_data;
> -
> guard(mutex)(&amd_pstate_driver_lock);
>
> - ret = amd_get_highest_perf(cpu, &cur_high);
> - if (ret) {
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> + if (amd_get_highest_perf(cpu, &cur_high))
> return;
> - }
> +
> + cpudata = policy->driver_data;
>
> prev_high = READ_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking);
> highest_perf_changed = (prev_high != cur_high);
> @@ -855,7 +847,6 @@ static void amd_pstate_update_limits(unsigned int cpu)
> if (cur_high < CPPC_MAX_PERF)
> sched_set_itmt_core_prio((int)cur_high, cpu);
> }
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 7fe0981a7e46..dde5212d256c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ static inline struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu)
> static inline void cpufreq_cpu_put(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { }
> #endif
>
> +/* Scope based cleanup macro for cpufreq_policy kobject reference counting */
> +DEFINE_FREE(put_cpufreq_policy, struct cpufreq_policy *, if (_T) cpufreq_cpu_put(_T))
> +
> static inline bool policy_is_inactive(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> return cpumask_empty(policy->cpus);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 11:25 [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fixes and optimizations Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 01/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the goto label in amd_pstate_update_limits Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:40 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 5:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 02/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix max_perf updation with schedutil Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:40 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 5:13 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 03/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Modify the min_perf calculation in adjust_perf callback Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:45 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 04/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the redundant des_perf clamping in adjust_perf Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:46 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 05/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Pass min/max_limit_perf as min/max_perf to amd_pstate_update Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:47 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 06/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Convert all perf values to u8 Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:46 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:48 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 07/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Modularize perf<->freq conversion Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:46 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:51 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 08/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the unnecessary cpufreq_update_policy call Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:46 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:52 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 09/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix cpufreq_policy ref counting Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:48 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 10:52 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 10/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Add missing NULL ptr check in amd_pstate_update Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:48 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 10:58 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Use scope based cleanup for cpufreq_policy refs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:50 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 11:11 ` Gautham R. Shenoy [this message]
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 12/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the unncecessary driver_lock in amd_pstate_update_limits Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:50 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 11:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6ne2MUPwl5fcxRb@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com \
--to=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).