Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Utilize cpu-type for CPU matching

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>]

* Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 01:40:55PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > Pawan Gupta (9):
> > >       x86/cpu: Prepend 0x to the hex values in cpu_debug_show()
> > >       cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid SMP calls to get cpu-type
> > >       perf/x86/intel: Use cache cpu-type for hybrid PMU selection
> > >       x86/cpu: Remove get_this_hybrid_cpu_*()
> > >       x86/cpu: Name CPU matching macro more generically (and shorten)
> > >       x86/cpu: Add cpu_type to struct x86_cpu_id
> > >       x86/cpu: Update x86_match_cpu() to also use cpu-type
> > >       x86/bugs: Declutter vulnerable CPU list
> > >       x86/rfds: Exclude P-only parts from the RFDS affected list
> > 
> > So it looks like this series, despite being complete, fell between the 
> > cracks during the usual end-of-year distractions.
> > 
> > To get the ball rolling I have applied the first 4 patches to 
> > tip:x86/cpu - the cpufreq one needed a small conflict resolution, and I 
> > have adjusted the debug output of the first one to not break 
> > pre-existing vertical tabulation.
> 
> Thanks for picking this up.
> 
> > Mind double checking the result in tip:x86/cpu and submit the remaining 
> > 5 patches on top of it?
> 
> I had quick look, fixes and merge resolution LGTM. I will submit the
> remaining 5 patches soonish.

Thanks!

	Ingo