From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/amd: Don't allow pre-emption in amd_pmu_lbr_reset()
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:02:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTd6BYr17ycdHR2a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231023160018.164054-3-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
* Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> wrote:
> Fixes a BUG reported during suspend to ram testing.
>
> ```
> [ 478.274752] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: rtcwake/2948
> [ 478.274754] caller is amd_pmu_lbr_reset+0x19/0xc0
> ```
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
> Fixes: ca5b7c0d9621 ("perf/x86/amd/lbr: Add LbrExtV2 branch record support")
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
> index eb31f850841a..5b98e8c7d8b7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
> @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ int amd_pmu_lbr_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
>
> void amd_pmu_lbr_reset(void)
> {
> - struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> + struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = get_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> int i;
>
> if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
> @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ void amd_pmu_lbr_reset(void)
>
> cpuc->last_task_ctx = NULL;
> cpuc->last_log_id = 0;
> + put_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> wrmsrl(MSR_AMD64_LBR_SELECT, 0);
> }
Weird, amd_pmu_lbr_reset() is called from these places:
- amd_pmu_lbr_sched_task(): during task sched-in during
context-switching, this should already have preemption disabled.
- amd_pmu_lbr_add(): this gets indirectly called by amd_pmu::add
(amd_pmu_add_event()), called by event_sched_in(), which too should have
preemption disabled.
I clearly must have missed some additional place it gets called in.
Could you please cite the full log of the amd_pmu_lbr_reset() call that
caused the critical section warning?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-24 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-23 16:00 [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for s3 with parallel bootup Mario Limonciello
2023-10-23 16:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Enable x2apic during resume from suspend if used previously Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24 8:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-24 15:36 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24 17:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-25 19:04 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24 17:30 ` Tom Lendacky
2023-10-23 16:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/amd: Don't allow pre-emption in amd_pmu_lbr_reset() Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2023-10-24 15:32 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24 15:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-24 16:04 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-24 16:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-25 11:47 ` Sandipan Das
2023-10-24 16:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-24 18:30 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24 22:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTd6BYr17ycdHR2a@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).