From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Meng Li <li.meng@amd.com>,
Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Michele Della Guardia <micheledellaguardia@yahoo.it>,
Linux Power Management <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Abnormal battery drain with kernel 6.5 (Ryzen 5500u)
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 15:05:08 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUNYNEnGC8cm6ALH@debian.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZPql6tqBCnXJh64J@amd.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1522 bytes --]
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 12:41:14PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 05:42:22PM +0800, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1] that have been already handled
> > there. Quoting from it:
> >
> > > After switching from 6.4.x kernel to 6.5 I experienced an abnormal battery drain since my laptop is actually never idle.
> > > I accepted default CPUfreq to schedutil and AMD Processor P-State mode is 3 (active).
> > >
> > > I expected a different behaviour, but am I missing something?
> > > In my boot configuration I had "amd_pstate.shared_mem=1" and tried to remove this switch, but did not affect my power consuption.
> > >
> > > Is there something changed from 6.4.x to 6.5 that requires a different configuration to get an optimal power consumption?
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for your attention
> >
> > See Bugzilla for the full thread.
> >
> > Anyway, I'm adding it to regzbot:
> >
> > #regzbot introduced: v6.4..v6.5 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217853
> >
>
> + Meng Li/Perry,
>
> May we know which CPU type are you using? Try "lscpu"?
>
Sorry for the replying just now.
The reporter (on Bugzilla) had bisected to commit c8afaa1b0f8bc9 ("locking:
remove spin_lock_prefetch"). Telling regzbot:
#regzbot introduced: c8afaa1b0f8bc9
#regzbot title: spin_lock_prefetch() removal causes abnormal battery drain on Ryzen 5500u
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-02 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-01 9:42 Fwd: Abnormal battery drain with kernel 6.5 (Ryzen 5500u) Bagas Sanjaya
2023-09-08 4:41 ` Huang Rui
2023-11-02 8:05 ` Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2023-11-02 9:15 ` Mateusz Guzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZUNYNEnGC8cm6ALH@debian.me \
--to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=Perry.Yuan@amd.com \
--cc=li.meng@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=micheledellaguardia@yahoo.it \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).