From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE88C2; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 07:05:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCB02F4; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 07:06:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 129883F6C4; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 07:05:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:05:38 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Cristian Marussi , Nikunj Kela , Prasad Sodagudi , Alexandre Torgue , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pmdomain: arm: Avoid polling for scmi_perf_domain Message-ID: References: <20231127135033.136442-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231127135033.136442-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 02:50:33PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > It was a mistake to prefer polling based mode when setting a performance > level for a domain. Let's instead rely on the protocol to decide what is > best and thus avoid polling when possible. > > Reported-by: Nikunj Kela > Fixes: 2af23ceb8624 ("pmdomain: arm: Add the SCMI performance domain") Ah, I hadn't even noticed before :). Anyways, Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla -- Regards, Sudeep