From: Roberto Ricci <io@r-ricci.it>
To: msizanoen <msizanoen@qtmlabs.xyz>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, rafael@kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz,
ytcoode@gmail.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Kernel booted via kexec fails to resume from hibernation
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 22:39:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_BDbwmFV6wxDPV1@desktop0a> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4081fbd9-0a5f-49d6-9553-4f964bf5ef27@qtmlabs.xyz>
On 2025-04-04 12:50 +0700, msizanoen wrote:
> Here's an updated version of the patch that better handles pathological e820
> tables.
>
> On 4/4/25 11:56, msizanoen wrote:
> > Also, can you reproduce this issue with a target kernel (the kernel
> > being kexec-ed) that has one of the patches attached (select the correct
> > one according to your kernel version) applied, with either kexec_load or
> > kexec_file_load?
> > [snip]
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> index 4893d30ce438..5d963df63b7a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> @@ -754,22 +754,21 @@ void __init e820__memory_setup_extended(u64 phys_addr, u32 data_len)
> void __init e820__register_nosave_regions(unsigned long limit_pfn)
> {
> int i;
> - unsigned long pfn = 0;
> + u64 last_addr = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < e820_table->nr_entries; i++) {
> struct e820_entry *entry = &e820_table->entries[i];
>
> - if (pfn < PFN_UP(entry->addr))
> - register_nosave_region(pfn, PFN_UP(entry->addr));
> -
> - pfn = PFN_DOWN(entry->addr + entry->size);
> -
> if (entry->type != E820_TYPE_RAM && entry->type != E820_TYPE_RESERVED_KERN)
> - register_nosave_region(PFN_UP(entry->addr), pfn);
> + continue;
>
> - if (pfn >= limit_pfn)
> - break;
> + if (last_addr < entry->addr)
> + register_nosave_region(PFN_UP(last_addr), PFN_DOWN(entry->addr));
> +
> + last_addr = entry->addr + entry->size;
> }
> +
> + register_nosave_region(PFN_UP(last_addr), limit_pfn);
> }
Your patch applied to v6.14 fixes the issue with kexec_file_load, but
kexec_load keeps not working.
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> index 57120f0749cc..656ed7abd28d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> @@ -753,22 +753,21 @@ void __init e820__memory_setup_extended(u64 phys_addr, u32 data_len)
> void __init e820__register_nosave_regions(unsigned long limit_pfn)
> {
> int i;
> - unsigned long pfn = 0;
> + u64 last_addr = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < e820_table->nr_entries; i++) {
> struct e820_entry *entry = &e820_table->entries[i];
>
> - if (pfn < PFN_UP(entry->addr))
> - register_nosave_region(pfn, PFN_UP(entry->addr));
> -
> - pfn = PFN_DOWN(entry->addr + entry->size);
> -
> if (entry->type != E820_TYPE_RAM)
> - register_nosave_region(PFN_UP(entry->addr), pfn);
> + continue;
>
> - if (pfn >= limit_pfn)
> - break;
> + if (last_addr < entry->addr)
> + register_nosave_region(PFN_UP(last_addr), PFN_DOWN(entry->addr));
> +
> + last_addr = entry->addr + entry->size;
> }
> +
> + register_nosave_region(PFN_UP(last_addr), limit_pfn);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
On master, kexec_file_load already worked due to the patch series you
mentioned in earlier emails. The kexec_load issue isn't affected by your
patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-04 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-13 21:28 [REGRESSION] Kernel booted via kexec fails to resume from hibernation Roberto Ricci
2025-01-13 21:31 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-01-14 3:42 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-01 12:59 ` msizanoen
2025-04-03 22:00 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-04-04 2:54 ` msizanoen
2025-04-04 4:56 ` msizanoen
2025-04-04 5:50 ` msizanoen
2025-04-04 20:39 ` Roberto Ricci [this message]
2025-04-05 5:15 ` msizanoen
2025-04-04 20:00 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-01-13 21:32 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-01-13 23:17 ` Andrew Morton
2025-01-14 13:19 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-01-14 13:16 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-01-15 4:04 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-15 12:00 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-01-16 11:52 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-01-17 1:55 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-17 3:41 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-17 7:52 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-01-16 9:54 ` Yuntao Wang
2025-01-22 9:45 ` RuiRui Yang
2025-01-22 13:01 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-01-27 2:39 ` Dave Young
2025-01-27 2:42 ` Dave Young
2025-03-09 17:09 ` Donald
2025-03-29 0:14 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-03-29 0:14 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-03-29 0:15 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-03-29 1:44 ` Baoquan He
2025-03-29 20:30 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-03-29 20:33 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-03-31 3:22 ` Dave Young
2025-04-03 21:59 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-04-04 23:31 ` Roberto Ricci
2025-04-04 23:37 ` Roberto Ricci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_BDbwmFV6wxDPV1@desktop0a \
--to=io@r-ricci.it \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msizanoen@qtmlabs.xyz \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ytcoode@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).