From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
vschneid@redhat.com, wkarny@gmail.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, qyousef@layalina.io,
tglx@linutronix.de, rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix frequency selection for non invariant case
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:59:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaZTlcFZaQefnf1v@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240114183600.135316-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
* Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> wrote:
> When frequency invariance is not enabled, get_capacity_ref_freq(policy)
> returns the current frequency and the performance margin applied by
> map_util_perf(), enabled the utilization to go above the maximum compute
> capacity and to select a higher frequency than the current one.
>
> The performance margin is now applied earlier in the path to take into
> account some utilization clampings and we can't get an utilization higher
> than the maximum compute capacity.
>
> We must use a frequency above the current frequency to get a chance to
> select a higher OPP when the current one becomes fully used. Apply
> the same margin and returns a frequency 25% higher than the current one in
> order to switch to the next OPP before we fully use the cpu at the current
> one.
>
> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wgWcYX2oXKtgvNN2LLDXP7kXkbo-xTfumEjmPbjSer2RQ@mail.gmail.com/
> Reported-by: Wyes Karny <wkarny@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240114091240.xzdvqk75ifgfj5yx@wyes-pc/
> Fixes: 9c0b4bb7f630 ("sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation")
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Wyes Karny <wkarny@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 95c3c097083e..d12e95d30e2e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,11 @@ unsigned long get_capacity_ref_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> if (arch_scale_freq_invariant())
> return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
>
> - return policy->cur;
> + /*
> + * Apply a 25% margin so that we select a higher frequency than
> + * the current one before the CPU is full busy
> + */
> + return policy->cur + (policy->cur >> 2);
> }
I've updated the changelog to better express what was broken and how we
fixed it. Ack?
Ingo
==========================>
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 19:36:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix frequency selection for non-invariant case
Linus reported a ~50% performance regression on single-threaded
workloads on his AMD Ryzen system, and bisected it to:
9c0b4bb7f630 ("sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation")
When frequency invariance is not enabled, get_capacity_ref_freq(policy)
is supposed to return the current frequency and the performance margin
applied by map_util_perf(), enabling the utilization to go above the
maximum compute capacity and to select a higher frequency than the current one.
After the changes in 9c0b4bb7f630, the performance margin was applied
earlier in the path to take into account utilization clampings and
we couldn't get a utilization higher than the maximum compute capacity,
and the CPU remained 'stuck' at lower frequencies.
To fix this, we must use a frequency above the current frequency to
get a chance to select a higher OPP when the current one becomes fully used.
Apply the same margin and return a frequency 25% higher than the current
one in order to switch to the next OPP before we fully use the CPU
at the current one.
[ mingo: Clarified the changelog. ]
Fixes: 9c0b4bb7f630 ("sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation")
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Bisected-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reported-by: Wyes Karny <wkarny@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Wyes Karny <wkarny@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240114183600.135316-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 95c3c097083e..eece6244f9d2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -133,7 +133,11 @@ unsigned long get_capacity_ref_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
if (arch_scale_freq_invariant())
return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
- return policy->cur;
+ /*
+ * Apply a 25% margin so that we select a higher frequency than
+ * the current one before the CPU is fully busy:
+ */
+ return policy->cur + (policy->cur >> 2);
}
/**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-14 18:36 [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix frequency selection for non invariant case Vincent Guittot
2024-01-15 12:15 ` Qais Yousef
2024-01-15 20:06 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-01-16 9:59 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2024-01-16 10:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-01-17 14:28 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-02-14 17:12 ` Jon Hunter
2024-02-14 17:19 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-02-14 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-02-14 17:22 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-02-14 17:57 ` Jon Hunter
2024-02-15 8:45 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-02-15 9:13 ` Greg KH
2024-02-15 10:00 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZaZTlcFZaQefnf1v@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wkarny@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox