From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-182.mta0.migadu.com (out-182.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8DD21F12EA for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 15:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.182 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729784706; cv=none; b=VaqsE01zMpZI9uilNbP7URodcmRZ3YlAGWMnt6TAf15Nrf49Y8VCcr7mnhSQYHvXdkZjWOES8gFjJhw3fGaLua+CHEatV5O8sxqFLgYXcVOHMN4sPMAXcMzG5rFrpQ+ve7NanFcUV3wxf+yoTiOVD/eG9A0jZChNqzjFK0hWj30= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729784706; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6I8qbzz7ximcghGIEO2unZUAhIwsriatLvIqpMrCiVs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BwQKVaeJ4/GvSoJMifvkyCG8tVLNVo5rR6PNHcd5DkkkDYMhRaErWXwOs4VZ/1ylWiPC20ZcnLBXDeyFbbnwDd4lEdXxq9A0LxVGl4x7zgIm6T2bx3eqCMCKNvK7Osb7nv76RbwBqLbhhP1VEp3U/h4lMOBr3O7o603VkLMJBaE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=s50vYbHV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="s50vYbHV" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 08:44:49 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1729784699; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Xk+d7Z4LZ/1qTUjGCbC24ANWAiUATci3sfG2VV3bTQI=; b=s50vYbHVxKPriUbyijJqut9CFyImL7JtJpvwDxKnlDeEWu3JMYeEzlCBWWd7ZMruwnOqpB VvDIZ8L5egp9CDD+dEudN1zYCjKmiTOapnHBxzklWRdAQEN0aLLfETohBS6o3AAwYopM35 7GdUuWw1gJcZCYJU/S3qn5AlPO0oBdg= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Oliver Upton To: David Woodhouse Cc: Miguel Luis , Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , Len Brown , Shuah Khan , David Woodhouse , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , Francesco Lavra Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] arm64: Use SYSTEM_OFF2 PSCI call to power off for hibernate Message-ID: References: <20241019172459.2241939-1-dwmw2@infradead.org> <20241019172459.2241939-7-dwmw2@infradead.org> <23C91005-7304-4312-A5E0-F5E6C05B3209@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Hi, On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 03:48:26PM +0200, David Woodhouse wrote: > On 24 October 2024 14:54:41 CEST, Miguel Luis wrote: > >Perhaps spec. F.b. could be accommodated by first invoking SYSTEM_OFF2 with > >PSCI_1_3_OFF_TYPE_HIBERNATE_OFF and checking its return value in case of a > >fallback to an invocation with 0x0 ? This already complies with F.b. The PSCI implementation is required to accept either 0 or 1 for HIBERNATE_OFF. Using 0 seems like a good choice for compatibility since ... > I wasn't aware there was any point. Are there any hypervisors which actually implemented it that way? Amazon Linux and Ubuntu guests already just use zero. > > We could add it later if such a hypervisor (now in violation of F.b) turns up, I suppose? IIUC, you're really wanting to 0x0 because there are hypervisors out there that violate the final spec and *only* accept this value. That's perfectly fine, but it'd help avoid confusion if the supporting comment was a bit more direct: /* * If no hibernate type is specified SYSTEM_OFF2 defaults to * selecting HIBERNATE_OFF. * * There are hypervisors in the wild that violate the spec and * reject calls that explicitly provide a hibernate type. For * compatibility with these nonstandard implementations, pass 0 * as the type. */ if (system_entering_hibernation()) invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_FN_NATIVE(1_3, SYSTEM_OFF2), 0 , 0, 0); Thoughts? -- Thanks, Oliver