Re: [PATCHv2] cpufreq/schedutil: Only bind threads if needed

[Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>]

On 10/24/24 10:13, Christian Loehle wrote:
> On 10/7/24 11:42, Christian Loehle wrote:
>> On 10/1/24 19:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 10:59 AM Christian Loehle
>>> <christian.loehle@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Remove the unconditional binding of sugov kthreads to the affected CPUs
>>>> if the cpufreq driver indicates that updates can happen from any CPU.
>>>> This allows userspace to set affinities to either save power (waking up
>>>> bigger CPUs on HMP can be expensive) or increasing performance (by
>>>> letting the utilized CPUs run without preemption of the sugov kthread).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> and I'm assuming that this will go in via tip.
>>
>> Peter, is that fine with you?
>>
>> @Juri: I didn't add your (somewhat implied?) ACK on v2, so I'd be happy to
>> get it on the dl_task_check_affinity() part.
>>
> 
> Peter,
> gentle ping on this.
> Thank you.

Hi Peter,
Another gentle ping.

The accumulated ACKs are:

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>

Regards,
Christian