From: "Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita" <skoralah@amd.com>
To: "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>,
Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
"linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>,
Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>,
Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Ying Huang <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>,
"Xingtao Yao (Fujitsu)" <yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@amd.com>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>,
Benjamin Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@amd.com>,
PradeepVineshReddy Kodamati <PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dax/hmem, e820, resource: Defer Soft Reserved registration until hmem is ready
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 21:01:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6e9ef76-cdb4-4dde-a7e9-955549f3a825@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537527fe-55be-4661-a0c6-ba9fe344bc35@fujitsu.com>
Hi Zhijian,
Sorry for the delay here.
On 8/31/2025 7:59 PM, Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) wrote:
>
>
> On 22/08/2025 11:41, Smita Koralahalli wrote:
>> Insert Soft Reserved memory into a dedicated soft_reserve_resource tree
>> instead of the iomem_resource tree at boot.
>>
>> Publishing Soft Reserved ranges into iomem too early causes conflicts with
>> CXL hotplug and region assembly failure, especially when Soft Reserved
>> overlaps CXL regions.
>>
>> Re-inserting these ranges into iomem will be handled in follow-up patches,
>> after ensuring CXL window publication ordering is stabilized and when the
>> dax_hmem is ready to consume them.
>>
>> This avoids trimming or deleting resources later and provides a cleaner
>> handoff between EFI-defined memory and CXL resource management.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/dax/hmem/device.c | 4 +--
>> drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c | 8 +++++
>> include/linux/ioport.h | 24 +++++++++++++
>> kernel/resource.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 5 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> index c3acbd26408b..aef1ff2cabda 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> @@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ void __init e820__reserve_resources_late(void)
>> res = e820_res;
>> for (i = 0; i < e820_table->nr_entries; i++) {
>> if (!res->parent && res->end)
>> - insert_resource_expand_to_fit(&iomem_resource, res);
>> + insert_resource_late(res);
>> res++;
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c b/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
>> index f9e1a76a04a9..22732b729017 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
>> @@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ static __init int hmem_register_one(struct resource *res, void *data)
>>
>> static __init int hmem_init(void)
>> {
>> - walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED,
>> - IORESOURCE_MEM, 0, -1, NULL, hmem_register_one);
>> + walk_soft_reserve_res_desc(IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0,
>> + -1, NULL, hmem_register_one);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c b/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
>> index c18451a37e4f..d5b8f06d531e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
>> @@ -73,10 +73,18 @@ static int hmem_register_device(struct device *host, int target_nid,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SOFT_RESERVE
>
>
> Note that dax_kmem currently depends on CONFIG_EFI_SOFT_RESERVED, so this conditional check may be redundant.
Removed in v2.
>
>
>
>> + rc = region_intersects_soft_reserve(res->start, resource_size(res),
>> + IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> + IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED);
>> + if (rc != REGION_INTERSECTS)
>> + return 0;
>> +#else
>> rc = region_intersects(res->start, resource_size(res), IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED);
>> if (rc != REGION_INTERSECTS)
>> return 0;
>> +#endif
>>
>
> Additionally, please add a TODO note here (e.g., "Add soft-reserved memory back to iomem").
Added.
>
>
>> id = memregion_alloc(GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (id < 0) {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
>> index e8b2d6aa4013..889bc4982777 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ioport.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
>> @@ -232,6 +232,9 @@ struct resource_constraint {
>> /* PC/ISA/whatever - the normal PC address spaces: IO and memory */
>> extern struct resource ioport_resource;
>> extern struct resource iomem_resource;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SOFT_RESERVE
>> +extern struct resource soft_reserve_resource;
>> +#endif
>>
>> extern struct resource *request_resource_conflict(struct resource *root, struct resource *new);
>> extern int request_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new);
>> @@ -255,6 +258,22 @@ int adjust_resource(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start,
>> resource_size_t size);
>> resource_size_t resource_alignment(struct resource *res);
>>
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SOFT_RESERVE
>> +static inline void insert_resource_late(struct resource *new)
>> +{
>> + if (new->desc == IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED)
>> + insert_resource_expand_to_fit(&soft_reserve_resource, new);
>> + else
>> + insert_resource_expand_to_fit(&iomem_resource, new);
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static inline void insert_resource_late(struct resource *new)
>> +{
>> + insert_resource_expand_to_fit(&iomem_resource, new);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> /**
>> * resource_set_size - Calculate resource end address from size and start
>> * @res: Resource descriptor
>> @@ -409,6 +428,11 @@ walk_system_ram_res_rev(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
>> extern int
>> walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start, u64 end,
>> void *arg, int (*func)(struct resource *, void *));
>> +int walk_soft_reserve_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags,
>> + u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
>> + int (*func)(struct resource *, void *));
>> +int region_intersects_soft_reserve(resource_size_t start, size_t size,
>> + unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc);
>>
>> struct resource *devm_request_free_mem_region(struct device *dev,
>> struct resource *base, unsigned long size);
>> diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
>> index f9bb5481501a..8479a99441e2 100644
>> --- a/kernel/resource.c
>> +++ b/kernel/resource.c
>> @@ -321,13 +321,14 @@ static bool is_type_match(struct resource *p, unsigned long flags, unsigned long
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> - * find_next_iomem_res - Finds the lowest iomem resource that covers part of
>> - * [@start..@end].
>> + * find_next_res - Finds the lowest resource that covers part of
>> + * [@start..@end].
>> *
>> * If a resource is found, returns 0 and @*res is overwritten with the part
>> * of the resource that's within [@start..@end]; if none is found, returns
>> * -ENODEV. Returns -EINVAL for invalid parameters.
>> *
>> + * @parent: resource tree root to search
>> * @start: start address of the resource searched for
>> * @end: end address of same resource
>> * @flags: flags which the resource must have
>> @@ -337,9 +338,9 @@ static bool is_type_match(struct resource *p, unsigned long flags, unsigned long
>> * The caller must specify @start, @end, @flags, and @desc
>> * (which may be IORES_DESC_NONE).
>> */
>> -static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
>> - unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc,
>> - struct resource *res)
>> +static int find_next_res(struct resource *parent, resource_size_t start,
>> + resource_size_t end, unsigned long flags,
>> + unsigned long desc, struct resource *res)
>> {
>> struct resource *p;
>>
>> @@ -351,7 +352,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
>>
>> read_lock(&resource_lock);
>>
>> - for_each_resource(&iomem_resource, p, false) {
>> + for_each_resource(parent, p, false) {
>> /* If we passed the resource we are looking for, stop */
>> if (p->start > end) {
>> p = NULL;
>> @@ -382,16 +383,23 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
>> return p ? 0 : -ENODEV;
>> }
>>
>> -static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
>> - unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc,
>> - void *arg,
>> - int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
>> +static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
>> + unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc,
>> + struct resource *res)
>> +{
>> + return find_next_res(&iomem_resource, start, end, flags, desc, res);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int walk_res_desc(struct resource *parent, resource_size_t start,
>> + resource_size_t end, unsigned long flags,
>> + unsigned long desc, void *arg,
>> + int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
>> {
>> struct resource res;
>> int ret = -EINVAL;
>>
>> while (start < end &&
>> - !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc, &res)) {
>> + !find_next_res(parent, start, end, flags, desc, &res)) {
>> ret = (*func)(&res, arg);
>> if (ret)
>> break;
>> @@ -402,6 +410,15 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
>> + unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc,
>> + void *arg,
>> + int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
>> +{
>> + return walk_res_desc(&iomem_resource, start, end, flags, desc, arg, func);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> /**
>> * walk_iomem_res_desc - Walks through iomem resources and calls func()
>> * with matching resource ranges.
>> @@ -426,6 +443,26 @@ int walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start,
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(walk_iomem_res_desc);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SOFT_RESERVE
>> +struct resource soft_reserve_resource = {
>> + .name = "Soft Reserved",
>> + .start = 0,
>> + .end = -1,
>> + .desc = IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED,
>> + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> +};
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(soft_reserve_resource);
>> +
>> +int walk_soft_reserve_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags,
>> + u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
>> + int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
>> +{
>> + return walk_res_desc(&soft_reserve_resource, start, end, flags, desc,
>> + arg, func);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(walk_soft_reserve_res_desc);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> /*
>> * This function calls the @func callback against all memory ranges of type
>> * System RAM which are marked as IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM and IORESOUCE_BUSY.
>> @@ -648,6 +685,20 @@ int region_intersects(resource_size_t start, size_t size, unsigned long flags,
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(region_intersects);
>>
>> +int region_intersects_soft_reserve(resource_size_t start, size_t size,
>> + unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc)
>
>
> Shouldn't this function be implemented uder `#if CONFIG_EFI_SOFT_RESERVE`? Otherwise it may cause compilation failures when the config is disabled.
Fixed it.
Thanks
Smita
>
> Thanks
> Zhijian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-30 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-22 3:41 [PATCH 0/6] dax/hmem, cxl: Coordinate Soft Reserved handling with CXL Smita Koralahalli
2025-08-22 3:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] dax/hmem, e820, resource: Defer Soft Reserved registration until hmem is ready Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01 2:59 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-09-30 4:01 ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita [this message]
2025-09-08 23:01 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-11 19:39 ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-09-25 18:17 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-09 16:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-30 4:56 ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-12-18 17:52 ` dan.j.williams
2026-01-13 18:29 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-22 3:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] dax/hmem: Request cxl_acpi and cxl_pci before walking Soft Reserved ranges Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01 3:08 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-09-04 17:35 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-22 3:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] dax/hmem, cxl: Tighten dependencies on DEV_DAX_CXL and dax_hmem Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01 3:28 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-09-30 4:04 ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-08-22 3:42 ` [PATCH 4/6] dax/hmem: Defer Soft Reserved overlap handling until CXL region assembly completes Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01 4:01 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-22 3:42 ` [PATCH 5/6] dax/hmem: Reintroduce Soft Reserved ranges back into the iomem tree Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-04 18:14 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-30 4:03 ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-08-22 3:42 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] cxl/region, dax/hmem: Guard CXL DAX region creation and tighten HMEM deps Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01 6:21 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-09-30 4:06 ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-08-26 23:21 ` [PATCH 0/6] dax/hmem, cxl: Coordinate Soft Reserved handling with CXL Alison Schofield
2025-08-28 23:34 ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a6e9ef76-cdb4-4dde-a7e9-955549f3a825@amd.com \
--to=skoralah@amd.com \
--cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
--cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=nathan.fontenot@amd.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox