From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 013/228] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:29:19 +0530 Message-ID: References: Return-path: In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c index a1260b4..71f8e15 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) data->freq_table[valid_states].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; perf->state = 0; - result = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, data->freq_table); + result = cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, data->freq_table); if (result) goto err_freqfree; @@ -868,8 +868,6 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) (u32) perf->states[i].power, (u32) perf->states[i].transition_latency); - cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(data->freq_table, policy->cpu); - /* * the first call to ->target() should result in us actually * writing something to the appropriate registers. -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e