Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
	Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
	Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH v1 7/8] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Align perf domains with L2 cache
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 18:23:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8f11abd-758e-4e5e-bf78-419b95100918@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1964444.taCxCBeP46@rjwysocki.net>

On 16/04/2025 20:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> On some hybrid platforms a group of cores (referred to as a module) may
> share an L2 cache in which case they also share a voltage regulator and
> always run at the same frequency (while not in idle states).
> 
> For this reason, make hybrid_register_perf_domain() in the intel_pstate
> driver add all CPUs sharing an L2 cache to the same perf domain for EAS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> New in v1.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -999,8 +999,11 @@
>  {
>  	static const struct em_data_callback cb
>  			= EM_ADV_DATA_CB(hybrid_active_power, hybrid_get_cost);
> +	struct cpu_cacheinfo *cacheinfo = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
> +	const struct cpumask *cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
>  	struct cpudata *cpudata = all_cpu_data[cpu];
>  	struct device *cpu_dev;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Registering EM perf domains without enabling asymmetric CPU capacity
> @@ -1014,9 +1017,25 @@
>  	if (!cpu_dev)
>  		return false;
>  
> -	if (em_dev_register_perf_domain(cpu_dev, HYBRID_EM_STATE_COUNT, &cb,
> -					cpumask_of(cpu), false))
> +	if (cacheinfo) {
> +		unsigned int i;
> +
> +		/* Find the L2 cache and the CPUs sharing it. */
> +		for (i = 0; i < cacheinfo->num_leaves; i++) {
> +			if (cacheinfo->info_list[i].level == 2) {
> +				cpumask = &cacheinfo->info_list[i].shared_cpu_map;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = em_dev_register_perf_domain(cpu_dev, HYBRID_EM_STATE_COUNT, &cb,
> +					  cpumask, false);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		cpudata->em_registered = ret == -EEXIST;
> +
>  		return false;
> +	}
>  
>  	cpudata->em_registered = true;

There seems to be an issue with late CPU-hotplug-in and this alignment
on L2 cache boundaries.

Example:

i7-13700K [P-cores: [0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14] E-cores: [16-23] w/ 'nosmt' and
'maxcpus=12', [16-19] & [20-23] share L2 cache.

root:/sys/kernel/debug/energy_model# cat cpu*/cpus
0
10
12
14
16-19
2
4
6
8

# echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu20/online

...
[  496.616050] root_domain 0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16-20: pd20:{ cpus=20
nr_pstate=4 } pd16:{ cpus=16-19 nr_pstate=4 } pd14:{ cpus=14 nr_pstate=4
} pd12:{ cpus=12 nr_pstate=4 } pd10:{ cpus=10 nr_pstate=4 } pd8:{ cpus=8
nr_pstate=4 } pd6:{ cpus=6 nr_pstate=4 } pd4:{ cpus=4 nr_pstate=4 }
pd2:{ cpus=2 nr_pstate=4 } pd0:{ cpus=0 nr_pstate=4 }
...

root:/sys/kernel/debug/energy_model# cat cpu*/cpus
0
10
12
14
16-19
20
2
4
6
8

# echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu21/online

...
[  589.001256] root domain span: 0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16-21
[  589.001265] pd_init: no EM found for CPU21
[  589.001266] sched_energy_set: stopping EAS
...

root:/sys/kernel/debug/energy_model# cat cpu*/cpus
0
10
12
14
16-19
20
2
4
6
8


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-27 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-16 17:44 [RFT][PATCH v1 0/8] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Enable EAS on hybrid platforms without SMT Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-16 17:48 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 1/8] cpufreq/sched: schedutil: Add helper for governor checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-17 12:23   ` Christian Loehle
2025-04-16 17:59 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 2/8] cpufreq/sched: Move cpufreq-specific EAS checks to cpufreq Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-17 12:28   ` Christian Loehle
2025-04-16 18:01 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 3/8] cpufreq/sched: Allow .setpolicy() cpufreq drivers to enable EAS Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-17 12:19   ` Christian Loehle
2025-04-17 13:01     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-17 13:03       ` Christian Loehle
2025-04-16 18:04 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 4/8] PM: EM: Move CPU capacity check to em_adjust_new_capacity() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-16 18:06 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 5/8] PM: EM: Introduce em_adjust_cpu_capacity() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-27 14:01   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-04-30 19:23     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-05-01 12:30       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-06 19:46         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-16 18:09 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 6/8] cpufreq: intel_pstate: EAS support for hybrid platforms Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-16 18:10 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 7/8] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Align perf domains with L2 cache Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-17 12:42   ` Christian Loehle
2025-04-27 16:23   ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2025-04-30 19:29     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-05-01 12:30       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-04-16 18:12 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 8/8] cpufreq: intel_pstate: EAS: Increase cost for CPUs using L3 cache Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-25 21:32   ` Christian Loehle
2025-04-25 21:39     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-18  9:58 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 0/8] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Enable EAS on hybrid platforms without SMT Christian Loehle
2025-04-18 19:52   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-05-12 13:23 ` [PATCH v1] cpufreq: Drop policy locking from cpufreq_policy_is_good_for_eas() Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a8f11abd-758e-4e5e-bf78-419b95100918@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox