From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
To: Prashant Malani <pmalani@google.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
z00813676 <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
sudeep.holla@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Dont read counters for idle CPUs
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 09:21:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJMCgGt5zu5Dhrd5@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFivqmKgiVEWMQ90Lh6T+Y44E6m4jmdF5sUFfVNTmgVHOMtZsw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 01:55:37PM -0700, Prashant Malani wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 at 02:16, Prashant Malani <pmalani@google.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 at 13:31, Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com> wrote:
> > > Thank you for the info, but I'm exploring ways that will not increase the time
> > > window between the reads.
> >
> > IMO this issue is intractable on non-RT OSes like Linux (at least,
> > Linux when it is not compiled for RT), since we basically need to
> > ensure atomicity for the reading of both ref and del registers together.
> > We can't disable preemption here, since some of
> > the code paths (like PCC regs) acquire semaphores [2].
>
> Actually, minor correction here. The PCC path is not the issue.
> It's the ffh read path[3], which requires interrupts to be enabled.
> Larger point still stands.
>
> [3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16-rc7/source/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c#L451
>
> BR,
>
> -Prashant
Would you mind giving it a go and see whether that improves things on your end ?
Note that this is a quick and semi-dirty hack though.
---
BR
Beata
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
index 5d07ee85bdae..65adb78a9a87 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -479,6 +479,11 @@ bool cpc_ffh_supported(void)
return true;
}
+bool cpc_burst_read_supported(void)
+{
+ return cpc_ffh_supported();
+}
+
int cpc_read_ffh(int cpu, struct cpc_reg *reg, u64 *val)
{
int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -501,6 +506,61 @@ int cpc_read_ffh(int cpu, struct cpc_reg *reg, u64 *val)
return ret;
}
+
+struct cpc_burst_read {
+ struct cpc_reg_sample *samples;
+ size_t count;
+};
+
+void counters_burst_read_on_cpu(void *arg)
+{
+ struct cpc_burst_read *desc = arg;
+ u64 value;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < desc->count; ++i) {
+ switch ((u64)desc->samples[i].reg->address) {
+ case 0x0:
+ value = read_corecnt();
+ break;
+ case 0x1:
+ value = read_constcnt();
+ break;
+ }
+ *(u64 *)desc->samples[i].sample_value = value;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < desc->count; ++i) {
+ struct cpc_reg *reg = desc->samples[i].reg;
+
+ value = *(u64 *)desc->samples[i].sample_value;
+ value &= GENMASK_ULL(reg->bit_offset + reg->bit_width - 1,
+ reg->bit_offset);
+ value >>= reg->bit_offset;
+ *(u64 *)desc->samples[i].sample_value = value;
+ }
+}
+
+static inline bool cpc_reg_supported(struct cpc_reg *reg)
+{
+ return !((u64)reg->address != 0x0 || (u64)reg->address != 0x1);
+}
+
+int cpc_burst_read_ffh(int cpu, struct cpc_reg_sample *samples, size_t count)
+{
+ struct cpc_burst_read desc = { samples, count };
+ int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
+ if (!cpc_reg_supported(samples[i].reg))
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ smp_call_function_single(cpu, counters_burst_read_on_cpu, &desc, 1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
int cpc_write_ffh(int cpunum, struct cpc_reg *reg, u64 val)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index 6b649031808f..c070627e4a1e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -617,6 +617,11 @@ bool __weak cpc_supported_by_cpu(void)
return false;
}
+bool __weak cpc_burst_read_supported(void)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
/**
* pcc_data_alloc() - Allocate the pcc_data memory for pcc subspace
* @pcc_ss_id: PCC Subspace index as in the PCC client ACPI package.
@@ -1077,6 +1082,21 @@ static int cpc_read(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 *val)
return 0;
}
+static int cpc_burst_read(int cpu, struct cpc_reg_sample *samples, size_t count)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ // Just for now - only ffh
+ if (!cpc_ffh_supported())
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < count; ++i)
+ if (samples[i].reg->space_id != ACPI_ADR_SPACE_FIXED_HARDWARE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ return cpc_burst_read_ffh(cpu, samples, count);
+}
+
+
static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val)
{
int ret_val = 0;
@@ -1515,8 +1535,21 @@ int cppc_get_perf_ctrs(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *perf_fb_ctrs)
}
}
- cpc_read(cpunum, delivered_reg, &delivered);
- cpc_read(cpunum, reference_reg, &reference);
+ // Verify whether the registers can be requested in one go
+ if (delivered_reg->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER &&
+ reference_reg->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER &&
+ cpc_burst_read_supported()) {
+
+ struct cpc_reg_sample samples[] = {
+ { &delivered_reg->cpc_entry.reg, &delivered },
+ { &reference_reg->cpc_entry.reg, &reference }
+ };
+
+ cpc_burst_read(cpunum, samples, ARRAY_SIZE(samples));
+ } else {
+ cpc_read(cpunum, delivered_reg, &delivered);
+ cpc_read(cpunum, reference_reg, &reference);
+ }
cpc_read(cpunum, ref_perf_reg, &ref_perf);
/*
diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
index 325e9543e08f..f094e275834a 100644
--- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
+++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
@@ -52,6 +52,12 @@ struct cpc_reg {
u64 address;
} __packed;
+
+struct cpc_reg_sample {
+ struct cpc_reg *reg;
+ void *sample_value;
+};
+
/*
* Each entry in the CPC table is either
* of type ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER or
@@ -165,6 +171,7 @@ extern unsigned int cppc_get_transition_latency(int cpu);
extern bool cpc_ffh_supported(void);
extern bool cpc_supported_by_cpu(void);
extern int cpc_read_ffh(int cpunum, struct cpc_reg *reg, u64 *val);
+extern int cpc_burst_read_ffh(int cpunum, struct cpc_reg_sample *samples, size_t count);
extern int cpc_write_ffh(int cpunum, struct cpc_reg *reg, u64 val);
extern int cppc_get_epp_perf(int cpunum, u64 *epp_perf);
extern int cppc_set_epp_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls, bool enable);
@@ -229,6 +236,10 @@ static inline int cpc_read_ffh(int cpunum, struct cpc_reg *reg, u64 *val)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
+static inline int cpc_burst_read_ffh(int cpunum, struct cpc_reg_sample *samples, size_t count)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
static inline int cpc_write_ffh(int cpunum, struct cpc_reg *reg, u64 val)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-06 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-19 0:09 [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq: CPPC: idle cpu perf handling Prashant Malani
2025-06-19 0:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Expose idle_cpu() to modules Prashant Malani
2025-06-19 0:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Dont read counters for idle CPUs Prashant Malani
2025-06-20 3:53 ` Jie Zhan
2025-06-20 5:07 ` Prashant Malani
2025-06-26 18:42 ` Prashant Malani
2025-06-27 7:54 ` Jie Zhan
2025-06-27 17:07 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-02 18:38 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-03 9:29 ` Beata Michalska
2025-07-07 8:32 ` Beata Michalska
2025-07-09 17:25 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-09 22:49 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-14 9:30 ` Beata Michalska
2025-07-15 6:28 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-21 17:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-07-21 19:40 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-22 3:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-07-22 6:02 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-30 7:31 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-31 8:27 ` Beata Michalska
2025-07-31 11:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-07-31 20:23 ` Beata Michalska
2025-08-01 4:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-08-07 0:19 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-11 6:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-08-11 18:43 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-11 19:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-11 20:01 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-14 11:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-15 5:12 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-16 8:25 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-13 10:12 ` Beata Michalska
2025-07-31 16:51 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-31 20:30 ` Beata Michalska
2025-08-01 9:16 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-04 20:55 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-06 7:21 ` Beata Michalska [this message]
2025-08-07 0:01 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-07 10:24 ` Beata Michalska
2025-08-08 2:14 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-13 10:15 ` Beata Michalska
2025-08-13 22:25 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-07 8:35 ` Beata Michalska
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJMCgGt5zu5Dhrd5@arm.com \
--to=beata.michalska@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmalani@google.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).