linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@google.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK"
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Add driver flag to avoid initial frequency verification
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 09:49:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKwVe4WSG7JApUAi@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250825045641.o2thjvs3xyuxavyk@vireshk-i7>

On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 10:26:41AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 23-08-25, 00:17, Prashant Malani wrote:
> > Some cpufreq drivers have a get() function which can return an unreliable
> > frequency. This can cause issues when switching governors. For instance,
> > a CPU would be on performance governor and have it's frequency (and
> > policy->cur) set to max. When the governor is switched to userspace, the
> > policy->cur is re-used, but it is checked against the frequency returned
> > by the driver's get() function. If it's different, the frequency will
> > get set to the new (incorrect) value.
> > 
> > To avoid this, add a flag that avoids this verify step on governor start
> > if the cpufreq driver opts in to it.
> > 
> > Since there are no users of this flag, no functional changes are
> > introduced here.
> > 
> > Cc: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@google.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |  3 ++-
> >  include/linux/cpufreq.h   | 10 ++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index b8937737d096..72e6552a40ea 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -2482,7 +2482,8 @@ int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >  
> >  	pr_debug("%s: for CPU %u\n", __func__, policy->cpu);
> >  
> > -	cpufreq_verify_current_freq(policy, false);
> > +	if (!(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_DONT_VERIFY_FREQ_ON_GOVERNOR_START))
> > +		cpufreq_verify_current_freq(policy, false);
> 
> I don't think it is okay to do this to hide a driver's failure to
> return the right frequency. What about all the other places where
> get() is still used ? Won't that cause similar issues elsewhere ?
> 
> The driver must be fixed for this, not the core. The core is doing the
Agreed.

---
BR
Beata
> right thing here, asking the driver to return the current frequency.
> If the driver is unsure, it can just return the current frequency from
> policy->cur instead.
> 
> -- 
> viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-25  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-23  0:17 [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Avoid cur frequency modification on governor start Prashant Malani
2025-08-23  0:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Add driver flag to avoid initial frequency verification Prashant Malani
2025-08-25  4:56   ` Viresh Kumar
2025-08-25  7:49     ` Beata Michalska [this message]
2025-08-23  0:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Don't verify cur frequency on governor start Prashant Malani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aKwVe4WSG7JApUAi@arm.com \
    --to=beata.michalska@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmalani@google.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).