From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ED9A2FBE1C for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760602811; cv=none; b=XwYaaVAkCN8XrXljhAeo2Pd+8G0XkwpCAArvKgtVgbfb99K9F1ID/j3aywn4pH0eFsLd/AhuneBOfiFn6oaJJnx9z9Xpon/tS0vWl+ELD8XPVQpsTJ5T/iavdVrCmT2TJzyLM0EpO5EJIe7tZYS6DPPryQczGW9IdE0udAd6Owo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760602811; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nquAaNfx6pYCWXER78qha80sffd1fOhWV8/6TUPD354=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XRLimyUeqd4LqFyWnEgxeJh4wEE3RrYn8SubIFQsk/i7DhhsVLK+xSyDmk6k7H1R3bK8SO0cgf146l8kDAxu76pfG0tZMpbmHHA/Qjs4qt/JiqUvKHaHf63GvTLc+5pWiV8xMC0W+N64shnQsCQ8VYHPqHrO+WMHRBaB5OiOKdk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=gOt/ef1F; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="gOt/ef1F" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=YixC XPlMaqrkZziFdLm6znkrHf724LnyFL5V9yYKXEs=; b=gOt/ef1FHGv+ejGnncsz +ZjTYIhgKDQ4f5yl/+0A73Yd671/d+aJOjRER2IqBlVTgmk5Y4OgV27fW0lmkmk/ FAsVfZYFoBI7vX1sal3ugPhYg1D+mjVF98BEXtfnNzJ0HwbOuociZ5LVv4Gqsoj1 Nx0JsgcAL8Y0DQENRcWpqD/gzQO3RyqGEDQtZ/ean9w5vU/foyChDrOoGlb8t7pj 2P9VmPFS0Fvp3qlWmNWJawEIdxJ2x8iMFP3AsyrmTk/eq8lUkjEEr2UWqx0GX1Fe Qsuv8AytThXsBqnbwgTRQHWYt3rST+7suOVOYERSGcYFeawn4Gl3khU0ZMb9o56P ig== Received: (qmail 3724143 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2025 10:20:07 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 16 Oct 2025 10:20:07 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@bi/mSEJBcNQgAwDPXwQHAL/S9V79e5yL Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 10:20:06 +0200 From: wsa+renesas To: Biju Das Cc: "marek.vasut@mailbox.org" , Marek Vasut , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "niklas.soderlund" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano , Geert Uytterhoeven , Lukasz Luba , "magnus.damm" , Zhang Rui , "linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] thermal/drivers/rcar_gen3: Document R-Car Gen4 and RZ/G2 support in driver comment Message-ID: References: <20251015155905.186612-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <62670d89-56f2-419e-8f80-0536858415f3@mailbox.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: > > > > I am not opposed to the patch. Just want to mention that such > > > > information gets stale all the time, so I would suggest: > > > > > > > > + R-Car Gen3 THS and compatible thermal sensor driver > > > This won't cover RZ/G2 which something else, and Gen5 seems like it > > > will be also a bit different, so maybe the list is now exhaustive? > > > > Sorry, I don't understand: If RZ/xx THS is compatible with R-Car Gen3 THS, why is this not covered? > > RZ/G2{H,M,N,E} thermal sensors should be compatible with R-Car Gen3{H,M3W,M3N,E} > But RZ/{G2L,G2LC,G2UL,V2L} uses different compatible. I do understand this. But if I say "this driver supports R-Car Gen3 THS and all THS instances compatible with it", this includes all RZ which are, well, compatible with it. And not those which are, well, not compatible with it? Where is the misunderstanding? I am feeling a little awkward here...