From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDC5E1917ED; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 22:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768860422; cv=none; b=DaJV8TI6jq2h34g8+SFGuBVcDDy8AJgYxMss5XP4htH9c67ttfQPU+jXhFPVFRZKmmOb/YI8KMoiOk5kyk7u0owX105xxDfTf/F8sbPMv7DhIIy3odrgozFjf33thrvUZEmo6CLJGq1RcdpdpTbu76r/pwtTDArovDqQ3SIkq2Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768860422; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Nafb/OJ7lFPcWlC17ZXYnF4HcJUl+iFGvBaNeELuzy8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=J++j7q/c5+Jmk5ufstk0olMLqVE8q2eOQkJf0ujokjesynuMVCTzQRorfd+HmQlxI4s4sgkvZws3NrHLOSHWJSBrL80WzI7Ggwjl3GxbiuJrjt94uPkqaJMzOwJKWQNOoXwWZtFvxIC3gOsy6CWrO1bnhe9z3mNFuqRjsk2vAyU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Cver8y8O; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Cver8y8O" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0330C19422; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 22:07:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768860421; bh=Nafb/OJ7lFPcWlC17ZXYnF4HcJUl+iFGvBaNeELuzy8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Cver8y8Oyj9J+Gx5rk8ecwY3aCbD1IfmObkpHKHd+ntNdp7WSN9l5Fvo128YUVZEo dxmLHFXQSiZKeXmFPZYll3bz9QdryagTWut5BsZ2Ma/STcC4BRZjBg+qMk53k/oHJ8 ftMwZsIWBuhQ0JJD75ooZrtPxA+VqMuce12YEC6TwkjAXwEQ+9B9wuYwk4xj5vjpZc 9g5lY5aZi3XhMHDGsOLxeBb+Cbg/kCrdS/WtWzBrdbxEfpMhdqatlsUe2NnklsTgr/ nyG1GNOcsHbzJWf7d75pxNpQcwvjrGzQgRBlQ5iWlCFvqRDIkb9+XC1nol0jsHMkMB 6Eduzn7yGQo+g== Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 23:06:58 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: LKML , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , Alexander Gordeev , Anna-Maria Behnsen , Ben Segall , Boqun Feng , Christian Borntraeger , Dietmar Eggemann , Heiko Carstens , Ingo Molnar , Jan Kiszka , Joel Fernandes , Juri Lelli , Kieran Bingham , Madhavan Srinivasan , Mel Gorman , Michael Ellerman , Neeraj Upadhyay , Nicholas Piggin , "Paul E . McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Sven Schnelle , Thomas Gleixner , Uladzislau Rezki , Valentin Schneider , Vasily Gorbik , Vincent Guittot , Viresh Kumar , Xin Zhao , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify idle cputime granularity test Message-ID: References: <20260116145208.87445-1-frederic@kernel.org> <20260116145208.87445-8-frederic@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Le Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 01:30:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 3:53 PM Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > cpufreq calls get_cpu_idle_time_us() just to know if idle cputime > > accounting has a nanoseconds granularity. > > > > Use the appropriate indicator instead to make that deduction. > > > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) > > or please let me know if you want me to take this patch. The patch is standalone but the rest of the patchset depends on it. Now I don't target this patchset for v6.20-rc1. So if you manage to sneak this patch in for v6.20-rc1, it works because I'll rebase on -rc1. Otherwise I'll need to keep it to avoid breaking some code assumptions. What do you think? Thanks. -- Frederic Weisbecker SUSE Labs