From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Frank Zhang <rmxpzlb@gmail.com>,
heiko@sntech.de, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com,
quentin.schulz@cherry.de,
Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pmdomain:rockchip: Fix init genpd as GENPD_STATE_ON before regulator ready
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 02:10:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWRG8w8GxzV9gpUK@venus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpx-hxv4QVW+zp8Zbd=-9vvmwsVJ2adem6V1gWLQteYsQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3448 bytes --]
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 03:07:37PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> + Nicolas
>
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 at 06:53, Frank Zhang <rmxpzlb@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > RK3588_PD_NPU initialize as GENPD_STATE_ON before regulator ready.
> > rknn_iommu initlized success and suspend RK3588_PD_NPU. When rocket
> > driver register, it will resume rknn_iommu.
> >
> > If regulator is still not ready at this point, rknn_iommu resume fail,
> > pm runtime status will be error: -EPROBE_DEFER.
> >
> > This patch set pmdomain to off if it need regulator during probe,
> > consumer device can power on pmdomain after regulator ready.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Zhang <rmxpzlb@gmail.com>
> > Tested-by: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com>
> > Tested-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
>
> The problem with the child-domain using a regulator has been discussed
> before [1] between Nicolas, Heiko and me. That said, I have looped in
> Nicolas to allow him to share his opinion about this too.
> fauxbus
> My view on is that I would prefer that we try to address/fix the root
> cause, rather than trying to paper over the problem as what seems to
> be suggested in the $subject patch. Or at least I need Nicolas/Heiko
> to confirm that they are fine with the $subject patch, before I pick
> it up.
FWIW my thoughts on this:
I believe the proper solution would be to acquire the regulator at
probe time how it is usually being done in other drivers. I think
this requires restructuring the driver, so that the sub-domains are
registered as sub-devices (e.g. via fauxbus) to avoid the
chicken-and-egg problem of the regulator for pmdomain1 needing
pmdomain2. As this modification is most likely too big to be
backported I think this patch should be merged for now:
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: db6df2e3fc16 ("pmdomain: rockchip: add regulator support")
Greetings,
-- Sebastian
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Simplified the regulator check logic, trun off pmdomain if need
> > regulator.
> > ---
> > drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> > index 4f1336a0f49a..997e93c12951 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> > @@ -879,6 +879,16 @@ static int rockchip_pm_add_one_domain(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
> > pd->genpd.name = pd->info->name;
> > else
> > pd->genpd.name = kbasename(node->full_name);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * power domain's needing a regulator should default to off, since
> > + * the regulator state is unknown at probe time. Also the regulator
> > + * state cannot be checked, since that usually requires IP needing
> > + * (a different) power domain.
> > + */
> > + if (pd->info->need_regulator)
> > + rockchip_pd_power(pd, false);
> > +
> > pd->genpd.power_off = rockchip_pd_power_off;
> > pd->genpd.power_on = rockchip_pd_power_on;
> > pd->genpd.attach_dev = rockchip_pd_attach_dev;
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAPDyKFr=GwJ+cO3cW4Ed_LsS=q_JtuuQPDweDpLgDO4hBLFXUA@mail.gmail.com/
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-12 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-16 5:52 [PATCH v2] pmdomain:rockchip: Fix init genpd as GENPD_STATE_ON before regulator ready Frank Zhang
2025-12-30 14:07 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-01-12 1:10 ` Sebastian Reichel [this message]
2026-01-15 16:23 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWRG8w8GxzV9gpUK@venus \
--to=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
--cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
--cc=rmxpzlb@gmail.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox