public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [rafael-pm:bleeding-edge 172/186] kernel/time/hrtimer.c:946:48: error: implicit declaration of function 'tick_nohz_is_active'; did you mean 'tick_nohz_init'?
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 17:05:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXozx0PXutnm8ECX@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202601240853.XfwHlHep-lkp@intel.com>

Le Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 08:59:57AM +0800, kernel test robot a écrit :
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git bleeding-edge
> head:   7e9b0371ed5b9bf9a80c59487f47fca0ba638f61
> commit: b0d640cf14148cbce9f1651fe6028c7586291cf5 [172/186] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify idle cputime granularity test
> config: nios2-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260124/202601240853.XfwHlHep-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: nios2-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.5.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260124/202601240853.XfwHlHep-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601240853.XfwHlHep-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    kernel/time/hrtimer.c: In function 'clock_was_set':
> >> kernel/time/hrtimer.c:946:48: error: implicit declaration of function 'tick_nohz_is_active'; did you mean 'tick_nohz_init'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      946 |         if (!hrtimer_hres_active(cpu_base) && !tick_nohz_is_active())
>          |                                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                                                tick_nohz_init

Oops, ok here is an update. Hopefully I got it right this time:

---
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 17:25:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify idle cputime granularity test

cpufreq calls get_cpu_idle_time_us() just to know if idle cputime
accounting has a nanoseconds granularity.

Use the appropriate indicator instead to make that deduction.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 7 +------
 include/linux/tick.h               | 2 ++
 kernel/time/hrtimer.c              | 2 +-
 kernel/time/tick-internal.h        | 2 --
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c           | 8 +++++++-
 kernel/time/timer.c                | 2 +-
 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index a6ecc203f7b7..bb7db82930e4 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -334,17 +334,12 @@ static void od_free(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs)
 static int od_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data)
 {
 	struct od_dbs_tuners *tuners;
-	u64 idle_time;
-	int cpu;
 
 	tuners = kzalloc(sizeof(*tuners), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!tuners)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	cpu = get_cpu();
-	idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
-	put_cpu();
-	if (idle_time != -1ULL) {
+	if (tick_nohz_is_active()) {
 		/* Idle micro accounting is supported. Use finer thresholds */
 		dbs_data->up_threshold = MICRO_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD;
 	} else {
diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
index ac76ae9fa36d..738007d6f577 100644
--- a/include/linux/tick.h
+++ b/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ enum tick_dep_bits {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
 extern bool tick_nohz_enabled;
+extern bool tick_nohz_is_active(void);
 extern bool tick_nohz_tick_stopped(void);
 extern bool tick_nohz_tick_stopped_cpu(int cpu);
 extern void tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(void);
@@ -142,6 +143,7 @@ extern u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time);
 extern u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time);
 #else /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
 #define tick_nohz_enabled (0)
+static inline bool tick_nohz_is_active(void) { return false; }
 static inline int tick_nohz_tick_stopped(void) { return 0; }
 static inline int tick_nohz_tick_stopped_cpu(int cpu) { return 0; }
 static inline void tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(void) { }
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index f8ea8c8fc895..e1bbf883dfa8 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ void clock_was_set(unsigned int bases)
 	cpumask_var_t mask;
 	int cpu;
 
-	if (!hrtimer_hres_active(cpu_base) && !tick_nohz_active)
+	if (!hrtimer_hres_active(cpu_base) && !tick_nohz_is_active())
 		goto out_timerfd;
 
 	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
index 4e4f7bbe2a64..597d816d22e8 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
@@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ static inline void tick_nohz_init(void) { }
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
-extern unsigned long tick_nohz_active;
 extern void timers_update_nohz(void);
 extern u64 get_jiffies_update(unsigned long *basej);
 # ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -171,7 +170,6 @@ extern void timer_expire_remote(unsigned int cpu);
 # endif
 #else /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
 static inline void timers_update_nohz(void) { }
-#define tick_nohz_active (0)
 #endif
 
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct hrtimer_cpu_base, hrtimer_bases);
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 21ac561a8545..81c619bf662c 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ void __init tick_nohz_init(void)
  * NO HZ enabled ?
  */
 bool tick_nohz_enabled __read_mostly  = true;
-unsigned long tick_nohz_active  __read_mostly;
+static unsigned long tick_nohz_active  __read_mostly;
 /*
  * Enable / Disable tickless mode
  */
@@ -702,6 +702,12 @@ static int __init setup_tick_nohz(char *str)
 
 __setup("nohz=", setup_tick_nohz);
 
+bool tick_nohz_is_active(void)
+{
+	return tick_nohz_active;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_is_active);
+
 bool tick_nohz_tick_stopped(void)
 {
 	struct tick_sched *ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 1f2364126894..7e1e3bde6b8b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(timers_migration_enabled);
 
 static void timers_update_migration(void)
 {
-	if (sysctl_timer_migration && tick_nohz_active)
+	if (sysctl_timer_migration && tick_nohz_is_active())
 		static_branch_enable(&timers_migration_enabled);
 	else
 		static_branch_disable(&timers_migration_enabled);
-- 
2.51.1


      reply	other threads:[~2026-01-28 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-24  0:59 [rafael-pm:bleeding-edge 172/186] kernel/time/hrtimer.c:946:48: error: implicit declaration of function 'tick_nohz_is_active'; did you mean 'tick_nohz_init'? kernel test robot
2026-01-28 16:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aXozx0PXutnm8ECX@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox