Re: PowerOp Design and working patch

[Matthew Locke <matt@nomadgs.com>]

Just to be clear.... I think the most important part to review and 
agree to is the powerop interface and implementation.  We can always 
add the right userspace interface for creation (if agreed to), 
suspend/resume integration, etc later.
On Aug 8, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Matthew Locke wrote:

>
> On Aug 8, 2006, at 6:52 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>> Anyway, lets get in core first, than talk about userspace interface
>> for chanig operating points, ok?
>
> Sounds like we are all in agreement on this point:)    Hopefully we can
> get agreement or some sort of conclusion on the latest interface we
> have presented (by Eugeny).  Once we get agreement there, we can start
> pushing powerop to andrew and then start working/discussing the other
> features necessary.
>
>> 							Pavel
>> -- 
>> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
>> (cesky, pictures)
>> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-pm mailing list
>> linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
>> https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-pm mailing list
> linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
> https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
>