From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Locke Subject: Re: PowerOp Design and working patch Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:03:50 -0700 Message-ID: References: <200608081344.k78DiY0t002356@olwen.urbana.css.mot.com> <20060808135247.GA4624@elf.ucw.cz> <36d9a1be46f5d66d7544035d86de4b47@nomadgs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <36d9a1be46f5d66d7544035d86de4b47@nomadgs.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Matthew Locke Cc: daviado@gmail.com, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, dsingleton@mvista.com, Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Just to be clear.... I think the most important part to review and = agree to is the powerop interface and implementation. We can always = add the right userspace interface for creation (if agreed to), = suspend/resume integration, etc later. On Aug 8, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Matthew Locke wrote: > > On Aug 8, 2006, at 6:52 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > >> Anyway, lets get in core first, than talk about userspace interface >> for chanig operating points, ok? > > Sounds like we are all in agreement on this point:) Hopefully we can > get agreement or some sort of conclusion on the latest interface we > have presented (by Eugeny). Once we get agreement there, we can start > pushing powerop to andrew and then start working/discussing the other > features necessary. > >> Pavel >> -- = >> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek >> (cesky, pictures) >> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-pm mailing list >> linux-pm@lists.osdl.org >> https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm >> > > _______________________________________________ > linux-pm mailing list > linux-pm@lists.osdl.org > https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm >