From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Remove policy create/remove notifiers
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:17:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa506a09afc758a615c952b9b53fd1e311409b14.1483591640.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
Those were added by:
commit fcd7af917abb ("cpufreq: stats: handle cpufreq_unregister_driver()
and suspend/resume properly")
but aren't used anymore since:
commit 1aefc75b2449 ("cpufreq: stats: Make the stats code non-modular").
Remove them. Also remove the redundant parameter to the respective
routines.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 16 +++++-----------
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index cc475eff90b3..53268bebdf1e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1078,15 +1078,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
return NULL;
}
-static void cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool notify)
+static void cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct kobject *kobj;
struct completion *cmp;
- if (notify)
- blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
- CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY, policy);
-
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpufreq_stats_free_table(policy);
kobj = &policy->kobj;
@@ -1104,7 +1100,7 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool notify)
pr_debug("wait complete\n");
}
-static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool notify)
+static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
unsigned long flags;
int cpu;
@@ -1117,7 +1113,7 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool notify)
per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu) = NULL;
write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
- cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy, notify);
+ cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);
free_cpumask_var(policy->real_cpus);
free_cpumask_var(policy->related_cpus);
free_cpumask_var(policy->cpus);
@@ -1244,8 +1240,6 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
goto out_exit_policy;
cpufreq_stats_create_table(policy);
- blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
- CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy);
write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
list_add(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list);
@@ -1282,7 +1276,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
out_free_policy:
- cpufreq_policy_free(policy, !new_policy);
+ cpufreq_policy_free(policy);
return ret;
}
@@ -1403,7 +1397,7 @@ static void cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
remove_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, dev);
if (cpumask_empty(policy->real_cpus))
- cpufreq_policy_free(policy, true);
+ cpufreq_policy_free(policy);
}
/**
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 30feeb34963e..0183986b3ba6 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -416,8 +416,6 @@ static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {}
#define CPUFREQ_ADJUST (0)
#define CPUFREQ_NOTIFY (1)
#define CPUFREQ_START (2)
-#define CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY (3)
-#define CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY (4)
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned int list);
--
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
reply other threads:[~2017-01-05 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa506a09afc758a615c952b9b53fd1e311409b14.1483591640.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).