From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com (mail-pl1-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7617372B57 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 13:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774359280; cv=none; b=orKqYNibkB9HvpIyvrmY7DmUVJAvpJ+juR+XPkKcsGPvV8Y4/pEfvhTWQQQiFCLiStKVJwmPURIRYQdFDIZF8OGJ9T+SIpdEn16TLa4TKh1rL07BZcOS9bXGjTpApFiodmGd8Op1So0Upu+5e/3jvCAH5HyHDJTdav/4MvDjUWo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774359280; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ydl90mdBaMZbcLqO4exUiw7RWgcNaF0oWnbQlH1GFPY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gJR25BgcaVxpiUaoeqYT1eFpQiqYFnTLbb3LGDboah2NfnciVuz/aAXwZrdOWYWXnFWfQxJF65tjoixMx1TyDxMx01s73FY95yVX65vtEX7dgevMOc3ECG1F03CRMinyVjkn3Lt+GQQYgA7G3wDsXO0Z82B0rj4QY7OUdBP24tI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=AoEzdKbZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="AoEzdKbZ" Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2b04fc8851cso13666785ad.0 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 06:34:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1774359278; x=1774964078; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0DRTw1k/Deyd3qw7jRPAvPgHwcdUHnkDo3iNQs7+2Vs=; b=AoEzdKbZK8r5+K6lftciVnxbOCnQxMRhPv+BI+s1QpIcaJfQyzR9qq9ntsVVOGhWKJ QByc8qLcoAjyCxvKnGP33TtOfTUa5r7uLvsGzA+Gz7hPOAgGna0ER4SxcGnv3chbk55N EUL1VkUJ5QV/mcw5jg7fFTgQK61yK+FcUOkTnlnjZHrIZoD65Mxx56jxXg2YZQqGjzkN nG4lNIqmeD1Hn4moqNe+0Ho2jsSqYRGsLY921hb4yNiCQYj8gNHxRf5KmgdotDnSmTjB ++aHm6ogGOi0sFR2/cN+cQuuB5x3JvMIgcKtdtEeu6AEtIMcZe33AeFjIu+4TbSTtHmb +NDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1774359278; x=1774964078; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0DRTw1k/Deyd3qw7jRPAvPgHwcdUHnkDo3iNQs7+2Vs=; b=HK2sbiSTR2g/C3mgLvL9hu7Mk6BH8NOCT2I9ELeg4lKORS7mNmZt1R33P8693Lw1BN 7phgOMeI5I1X7JqMPTJ8Gpq+VLP6Qqqka1/EK/r0BZ1qAXU4Va5KPd1feocd6JPQVfGC rwQ2djNbXeM7QBLQJSxLfwgiyQkvnkeRl3HuTNBiU+HLLXdhJ7ycX9QLbA598jz4jL0l CN2VKLpntEoNmhAwHDOMVRr35CjbFLNA06DEJusKmXBVvP+DvJ2/Oh09dAcx8X9Yx+6Z EevzQQUkTzYNg8V9K5AxIcjVNqrN/YjrZvAidWYTPXSbeZzcHSn6piUnhT7zYcv/KL6g 7W4A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUUxeDx+cQYRWg5JEtH4rXmFXzvsNJd7c7Sfbp4M4TIi3FLysTcG6Djca/CRkgiQpOYiO5CprEzOw==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxrNHdJ90NOgUurza8gDifBgdy08ZjI21WFP7d7gJdy6rrIPSHf tCaynhbdM5HkZRU5iVJlktW+gswyV6q3snywco4ohijFBcxJJ0cnILzW X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzzeG2MUK3QjtZETaDjJHoYvkXiD+pzk4cftErOE3JJqOPvrI3OoynK5tffrUlH cpmd4p/XtqrVR6a7QVWJ7zJs/alZmhm3HMzTiSUPf7qfcscB7I7Nah72Zp7dptsrkO9eZ02n1DS IDToqCJDqQPeXKgUJCdZOgWFV3icw5eTAQTqSnmU01/VWVwqhlhlqduykXCRIpRHuUdnYHQNEKq kpjY8wRyST1EejEC5vVj0DJWnXu2Jnymv3v+OZEVIbEUc13xNlMKFRIyLdKIGHCrGxwOq/UwK++ GGFSCIjQa4LVcxKUGRbhfwB5A0S97/m4zNrNjt2N8Ay3MSMSt7aT61ehYl5W8gZ5OOxWx4KgoQi TsCEYXSxCYq9LuFv6zf2LEoqTZECQWXe3McGzKNnlR0wsxiFvkqtHz39h6OsCimThPvuBVeUkGQ A2d2EmGwwDj7KXpnygtsiYFH8vsVO2Q0BYg0+z9+2z3Ds1p0Kouo908z5zN7g= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ce82:b0:2ae:47c9:68b9 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2b0827ea2edmr157633805ad.49.1774359277914; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 06:34:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([103.70.166.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2b08366b5besm148426185ad.55.2026.03.24.06.34.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Mar 2026 06:34:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 19:04:32 +0530 From: Gopi Krishna Menon To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Daniel Baluta , rafael@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, vireshk@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, soc@lists.linux.dev, simona.toaca@nxp.com, d-gole@ti.com, m-chawdhry@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: st: spear: fix dtbs warning on spear thermal sensor Message-ID: References: <20260323133814.14152-1-krishnagopi487@gmail.com> <20260323133814.14152-3-krishnagopi487@gmail.com> <20260324-smoky-radical-hyrax-1274a9@quoll> <5a9f84fe-5827-48e7-8e4e-699cf8ae4776@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 07:00:49PM +0530, Gopi Krishna Menon wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 11:01:05AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On 24/03/2026 11:00, Daniel Baluta wrote: > > > On 3/24/26 11:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 07:08:09PM +0530, Gopi Krishna Menon wrote: > > >>> Running DTBS checks on st/spear1340-evb.dtb results in the following > > >>> warning: > > >>> > > >>> thermal@e07008c4 (st,thermal-spear1340): Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('thermal_flags' was unexpected) > > >>> from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/st,thermal-spear1340.yaml > > >> How is it possible if there is no such file? > > >> > > >> Did you just add new warning in patch #1 and then claim in patch #2 that > > >> you fix it? > > >> > > >> You completely miss the point why this change is needed: how could the > > >> DTS work before? It could not. And that should be your justification for > > >> the patch, with explanation why it could not work. > > > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong but I think there was a hidden bug here  > > > > > > drivers/thermal/spear_thermal.c:spear_thermal_probe: > > > > > >       if (!np || !of_property_read_u32(np, "st,thermal-flags", &val)) { > > > »       »       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed: DT Pdata not passed\n");                                                                                                                          > > > »       »       return -EINVAL; > > > »       } > > > > > > So, the driver was checking for the correct property as pointed by  > > > > Yes > > > > > > > > bindings/thermal/spear-thermal.txt but the dts was using the wrong > > > > No, DTS had two properties - correct one and incorrect. > > > > Yup, spear13xx is included by spear1310.dtsi and spear1340.dtsi both of > which have st,thermal-flags correctly defined. When working on this > patch, after converting the binding, I ran dtbs check and upon seeing > dtbs warning immediately fixed it thinking it was complaining because > st,thermal-flags (thermal_flags) was written incorrectly. (Which is not > incorrect as st,thermal-flags was there in the final node but there was one I meant 'incorrect' here not 'not incorrect' > additional property named thermal_flags as well which is not allowed as > UnevaluatedProperty is set to false). > > Also I dont think we have to override the st,thermal-flags property in > spear1310.dtsi as the flags value is same in spear13xx.dtsi and > spear1310.dtsi (0x7000). > > > > > > > property name: arch/arm/boot/dts/st/spear13xx.dtsi » » » thermal@e07008c4 { » » » » compatible = "st,thermal-spear1340"; » » » » reg = <0xe07008c4 0x4>; » » » » thermal_flags = <0x7000>; » » » }; And because this check is wrong: > > > > > >       if (!np || !of_property_read_u32(np, "st,thermal-flags", &val)) { > > > > > > people really didn't notice it. > > > > > > The check should be: > > > > > >       if (!np || of_property_read_u32(np, "st,thermal-flags", &val)) { > > > »       »       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed: DT Pdata not passed\n");                                                                                                                          > > > »       »       return -EINVAL; > > > »       } > > > > > > So, this actual patch has uncovered a bug!  > > > > Yes. Driver also has bug, so probably was never working. The point is > > whatever commit is doing, the dtbs_check warning is not the > > justification, because it was introduced by this patchset. > > > > Please correct me if I am wrong Krzysztof but should i send a seperate patch > fixing the thermal_flags property (Not connected to these converted > bindings)?. > > Also, is it necessary to set additionalProperties to true? I am not able to > figure out if that is needed. > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > > Thanks, > Gopi Krishna Menon