From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
Cc: "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"zhenglifeng1@huawei.com" <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
"viresh.kumar@linaro.org" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
"ionela.voinescu@arm.com" <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
Krishna Sitaraman <ksitaraman@nvidia.com>,
Sanjay Chandrashekara <sanjayc@nvidia.com>,
"zhanjie9@hisilicon.com" <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>,
"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>, Matt Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com>,
"skhan@linuxfoundation.org" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Bibek Basu <bbasu@nvidia.com>,
"rdunlap@infradead.org" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"mario.limonciello@amd.com" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: CPPC: add autonomous mode boot parameter support
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 14:55:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeb16dd2-0eb5-4fba-9b45-b5ef483ab7b4@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8349bae0-ec72-40bb-a6cf-6232d8c0cfe2@nvidia.com>
On 4/24/26 14:10, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>
> On 20/04/26 18:37, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>>
>>>>> On 3/17/26 16:10, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>>>>>> Add kernel boot parameter 'cppc_cpufreq.auto_sel_mode' to enable
>>>>>> CPPC
>>>>>> autonomous performance selection on all CPUs at system startup
>>>>>> without
>>>>>> requiring runtime sysfs manipulation. When autonomous mode is
>>>>>> enabled,
>>>>>> the hardware automatically adjusts CPU performance based on workload
>>>>>> demands using Energy Performance Preference (EPP) hints.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When auto_sel_mode=1:
>>>>>> - Configure all CPUs for autonomous operation on first init
>>>>>> - Set EPP to performance preference (0x0)
>>>>>> - Use HW min/max when set; otherwise program from policy limits
>>>>>> (caps)
>>>>>> - Clamp desired_perf to bounds before enabling autonomous mode
>>>>>> - Hardware controls frequency instead of the OS governor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The boot parameter is applied only during first policy
>>>>>> initialization.
>>>>>> On hotplug, skip applying it so that the user's runtime sysfs
>>>>>> configuration is preserved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> (Documentation)
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Part 1 [1] of this series was applied for 7.1 and present in next.
>>>>>> Sending this patch as reworked version of 'patch 11' from [2] based
>>>>>> on next.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260206142658.72583-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251223121307.711773-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 13 +++
>>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 84
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>>>>> b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>>>>> index fa6171b5fdd5..de4b4c89edfe 100644
>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>>>>> @@ -1060,6 +1060,19 @@ Kernel parameters
>>>>>> policy to use. This governor must be
>>>>>> registered in the
>>>>>> kernel before the cpufreq driver probes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + cppc_cpufreq.auto_sel_mode=
>>>>>> + [CPU_FREQ] Enable ACPI CPPC autonomous
>>>>>> performance
>>>>>> + selection. When enabled, hardware
>>>>>> automatically adjusts
>>>>>> + CPU frequency on all CPUs based on workload
>>>>>> demands.
>>>>>> + In Autonomous mode, Energy Performance
>>>>>> Preference (EPP)
>>>>>> + hints guide hardware toward performance (0x0)
>>>>>> or energy
>>>>>> + efficiency (0xff).
>>>>>> + Requires ACPI CPPC autonomous selection
>>>>>> register support.
>>>>>> + Format: <bool>
>>>>>> + Default: 0 (disabled)
>>>>>> + 0: use cpufreq governors
>>>>>> + 1: enable if supported by hardware
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> cpu_init_udelay=N
>>>>>> [X86,EARLY] Delay for N microsec between
>>>>>> assert and de-assert
>>>>>> of APIC INIT to start processors. This delay
>>>>>> occurs
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
>>>>>> index 5dfb109cf1f4..49c148b2a0a4 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
>>>>>> @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +/* Autonomous Selection boot parameter */
>>>>>> +static bool auto_sel_mode;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIE
>>>>>> static enum {
>>>>>> FIE_UNSET = -1,
>>>>>> @@ -708,11 +711,74 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct
>>>>>> cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>>>>> policy->cur = cppc_perf_to_khz(caps, caps->highest_perf);
>>>>>> cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf = caps->highest_perf;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - ret = cppc_set_perf(cpu, &cpu_data->perf_ctrls);
>>>>>> - if (ret) {
>>>>>> - pr_debug("Err setting perf value:%d on CPU:%d.
>>>>>> ret:%d\n",
>>>>>> - caps->highest_perf, cpu, ret);
>>>>>> - goto out;
>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>> + * Enable autonomous mode on first init if boot param is set.
>>>>>> + * Check last_governor to detect first init and skip if
>>>>>> auto_sel
>>>>>> + * is already enabled.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>> If the goal is to set autosel only once at the driver init,
>>>>> shouldn't this be done in cppc_cpufreq_init() ?
>>>>> I understand that cpu_data doesn't exist yet in
>>>>> cppc_cpufreq_init(), but this seems more appropriate to do
>>>>> it there IMO.
>>>>>
>>>>> This means the cpudata should be updated accordingly
>>>>> in this cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init() function.
>>>> In an earlier version [1], the setup was in cppc_cpufreq_init() but
>>>> was moved to cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init() to improve per-CPU error
>>>> handling.
>>>> Keeping the setup in cppc_cpufreq_init() helps to avoid the
>>>> last_governor
>>>> check. We can warn for a CPU failing to enable and continue so other
>>>> CPUs keep autonomous mode.
>>>> cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init() would then just check the auto_sel state
>>>> from register and sync policy limits from min/max_perf registers when
>>>> autonomous mode is active.
>>>> Please let me know your thoughts.
>>> FWIU the auto_sel_mode module parameter allows to
>>> configure the default auto_sel_mode when the driver is
>>> first loaded, so there should not need to check that again
>>> whenever cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init() is called.
>>> Maybe Ionela saw something we didn't see ?
>>
>> AFAIU, the concern in that review [1] was about error handling as the
>> earlier version disabled auto_sel on all CPUs if any single CPU failed.
>> Per-CPU error handling in cppc_cpufreq_init() (warn and continue)
>> addresses that. Can't think of more reason.
>> Do you have anything in mind?
>>
>
> Actually, one case where cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init() would be needed
> is when CPUs are offline at boot. So I will keep the setup in
> cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init() in v2 same as present in current version.
>
Wouldn't it be possible to loop over the "cpu_present_mask"
as you currently do in cppc_cpufreq_exit() ?
------
Another issue about relying on "cpu_data->perf_ctrls.auto_sel" in:
"""
if (auto_sel_mode && policy->last_governor[0] == '\0' &&
!cpu_data->perf_ctrls.auto_sel) {
"""
is that the cpu_data struct is fresh memory coming from
cppc_cpufreq_get_cpu_data(), so it might always be 0
I think.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-24 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 15:10 [PATCH] cpufreq: CPPC: add autonomous mode boot parameter support Sumit Gupta
2026-03-24 18:18 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-04-06 18:08 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-04-10 13:47 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-04-13 5:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2026-04-20 13:13 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-04-20 13:07 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-04-24 12:10 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-04-24 12:55 ` Pierre Gondois [this message]
2026-04-24 13:52 ` Sumit Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aeb16dd2-0eb5-4fba-9b45-b5ef483ab7b4@arm.com \
--to=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sanjayc@nvidia.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox